Mariner mock 3

By Jared Stanger

We’re just over three weeks away from the 2025 MLB Draft, and things are speeding up in the process. The finals of the College World Series start tomorrow, and we’ve seen some high pressure, high stakes performances from many names relevant to this year’s draft. Multiple summer leagues are underway including the MLB Draft League and the Cape Cod League. And last week we had the fifth annual MLB Draft Combine. We’re getting lots of new, more specific data points on a lot of players hoping to hear their names called in July.

This new info is, perhaps, pointing us towards a clearer picture of the broader overall draftboard. What are the tiers of different player profiles. Who are the guys that are rising. Who are the guys at the back of the draft that have differentiated themselves from guys that will probably go undrafted.

In my previous mock draft for the Mariners; I speculated on a draft strategy wherein Seattle would look to, effectively, trade their 2025 first round pick at #3 overall to the 2026 draft where it would become the #4 overall pick, in what looks to be a stronger class at the top of the draft. I knew when I wrote that mock this idea was unlikely…nobody in MLB ever does this. I still think it would be a bold, innovative, and smart move. But it’s like a 1% chance that it happens.

So what would be the second-best draft strategy in a weak top-end draft class?? I think it would be to hyper-focus on prep players. The guys that we don’t have as clear of a picture on their future values, but which could mean higher upside (while, naturally, also having the risk of lower upside). While seeking that upside, I think it’s simultaneously important to get multiple bites at that apple, which means looking for an underslot signer for that #3 pick (and maybe a couple select points on day two of the draft), which can then give you surplus bonus money to offer to players that fall to later picks.

Something that the media has come to pretty consensus agreement on for this draft class is that there is a pretty strong group of high school shortstops. This group includes to some degree, and some variance in likelihood that they can stick at short, players like: Ethan Holliday, Eli Willits, Billy Carlson, Jojo Parker, Steele Hall, and Daniel Pierce. These are all players ranked in the top 20 overall on most big boards.

Holliday is widely considered to be the likely #1 pick going to the Washington Nationals. We won’t look much at him.

Willits is the #5 player on the MLB board. Listed 6’1″/180lbs and a switch-hitter. Willits is a young player for the class (which some teams prefer) as he won’t turn 18 until December.

Carlson is #7 on the MLB board. Listed 6’1″/185lbs and a righthanded hitter. Carlson will turn 19 about two weeks after the draft. He might be the best pure defender amongst these early candidates.

Parker is #10 on the MLB board. Listed 6’2″/200lbs and hitting lefthanded. Parker probably has the best hit-tool amongst this group, while probably having the least likelihood of sticking at short. He turns 19 in August. Of this group, Parker is the one that two separate media sources have independently connected to Seattle as a potential underslot signee.

Hall is the #13 player on the MLB board. Listed 6’0″/180lbs and hitting righty. Hall is another younger player that will turn 18 about ten days after the draft. Interestingly, Hall and Billy Carlson are both committed to the University of Tennessee. It’s unlikely both make it to Knoxville.

Pierce is the #18 overall on teh MLB board. Listed 6’0″/185lbs and hitting righthanded. He will turn 19 in August.

Is there a combination of present grade, future grade, and signing bonus figure from this group that puts one of these guys ahead of the others? And, really, part of the equation is actually: “is it better to draft a college player at/near/above bonus slot at #3, or would it be better to get an underslot player with more upside that then also allows you to get another upside player later on?” Basically a question of, “can you get two for one?”

In this particular draft class, I think they should do the latter. Let’s go for the 2×1.

In my opinion, the two guys to focus on in this scenario are Billy Carlson and Jojo Parker. This basically represents the best defender of the group and the best hitter of the group. In my first mock draft in May, I actually was going with Carlson as I just loved his glove so much. In theory, Seattle has two pretty strong shortstop candidates already coming through the system in Colt Emerson and Felnin Celesten. We don’t, necessarily, HAVE to keep a guy at shortstop.

So, in this mock, I’m pivoting to take the better hitter, who also happens to be the guy that has some buzz surrounding Seattle interest. There’s also the fact that Parker was a member of the 2024 East Coast Pro all star team of players from the states of Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, etc that were chosen by Mariner scouts and played under the name “Mariners”. There is some documented connection between Seattle and Jojo (and Jojo’s twin brother, Jacob).

#1.3 – SS, Purvis HS, Jojo Parker

While the hit-tool is clearly the headliner here; as I’ve dug in deeper to Parker I think his power and his glove are underrated. No, I don’t think he sticks at shortstop, but I do think he sticks on the dirt. His fielding actions are smooth and efficient. I think his move off shortstop will be dictated more by his range than his literally fielding. His arm looks decent. I think he’s a future third baseman. And that’s where the underrated power will come into play. I think his power is coming along very nicely and he will have enough power for 3B. He might end up similar to another player that has recently been in the news: Rafael Devers.

Now comes the business end of this selection. As a guy being projected as the #10 player in this class; if you draft him at #3, you’re doing so (in part) to save some money. The #3 pick holds a bonus slot value of $9.5million. The bonus slot value of, say, the #10 pick is $6.2million. The middle point between those two is $7.85million. If you sign Parker for, roughly, $8million, that $1.5million savings will come in extremely useful on later picks. For those that question the plausibility of underslotting a high school player at #3…Max Clark was drafted at #3 overall in 2023 and signed for about $600k underslot. The same draft, Blake Mitchell signed for ~$1.08million underslot at pick #8. Kumar Rocker drafted out of college in 2022 at pick #3 signed for $2.39mill underslot.

#1.35c – 3B/OF, Oaks Christian HS, Quentin Young

The second big adjustment in this mock draft is that my intended/previous target at #35, RHP Patrick Forbes, is now going to be off the board after his performance in the CWS. But, with the bonus savings at #3, this pick can now be another prep player.

I love 2B/OF Sean Gamble. What an impressive, mature profile. He kind of reminds me of Corbin Carroll.

I love local product Xavier Neyens, but as a lefthanded hitter with future 3B in his projection; he’s probably redundant after drafting Parker.

And there’s potentially a handful of prep pitchers that profile similar to 2024 draftee Ryan Sloan that might fit here: LHP Jack Bauer, RHP Aaron Watson, RHP Landon Harmon, LHP Johnny Slawinski. High school arms are historically the riskiest draft demographic, and Seattle historically can find/develop interesting, future-MLB arms from college pitchers in the midrounds of the draft.

I’m going with Quentin Young here because he’s different than what we’ve ever seen the M’s draft out of high school. He’s a power-first righthanded hitter when Seattle has almost always drafted hit-first, lefthanded guys.

Young is an MLB bloodline guy with two uncles that played in Delmon and Dmitri Young. He’s already 6’6″/225lbs with grown-man exit velocities touching 115mph at this week’s Combine. He’s got pretty surprising fluidity playing the infield at that size, so he might stick there. But he’s also got enough speed when underway that he might make a decent outfielder.

Quentin is ranked #33 overall on the MLB board, so this isn’t a reach or a fall. And then it comes down to giving him enough bonus to sign him away from college commitment to LSU. The slot value for #35 is $2.75mill. With most of the savings from the #3 pick; we could get Young signed for $4mill, which equates to about the #21 overall pick, aka first round money.

#2.57 – LHP, Iowa, Cade Obermueller

If there’s a second category of player that the 2025 draft looks especially strong in; it’s probably lefthanded pitching. And that is something that Seattle is woefully short on in their farm and major league team. I don’t know why they treat LHP the way that they do. I speculate they have data that points to RHP being stronger performers in TMobile Park, but who knows.

There’s also something interesting going on this year with pitchers that are shorter in stature. There are an unusually high number of starting pitchers that are right about 6’0″ tall. Liam Doyle is listed 6’2″ but I don’t believe that at all. JB Middleton is listed 6’0″, Gage Wood is listed 6’0″, Obermueller is listed 6’0″, JD Thompson is listed 6’0″, Brian Curley is listed 5’10”, Zane Taylor is listed 6’0″. Could there be a Spencer Strider in that group?

Obermueller might be merging these two factions. For the year, he posted a 3.02 ERA, 1.128 WHIP, 12.6 SO/9, 3.5 BB/9. Compare that to likely top five pick Jamie Arnold: 2.98 ERA, 1.063 WHIP, 12.6 SO/9, 2.9 BB/9. And then note the similar pitching mechanics/release heights of these two players. These are surprisingly similar profiles, but with a huge discount on Cade.

#3.91 – OF, George Mason, James Quinn-Irons

There’s a nice little pocket of players in this class that have imposing size, nice power, sneaky good gloves, and bonus basestealing in the outfield. I like JQI the best of that grouping. Listed 6’5″/230lbs and posting a 2025 line of: .419/.523/1.258, with 16 HR, 42 XBH, 39 BB, 46 SO.

#4.122 – RHP, Tulane, Michael Lombardi

After losing out on Patrick Forbes, I think I’ve found a similar profile in Lombardi. Forbes was formerly a two-way player that is now pitching-only for the last two years. Lombardi was still playing two-ways this year with games as CF, 2B, 1B and P (primarily CF).

As a pitcher, Lombardi had 23 appearances, including 6 games started. I don’t have splits for how his numbers broke down starter vs reliever, but his overall performance went: 2.14 ERA, 0.976 WHIP, 15.6 SO/9, 4.5 BB/9 across 42 innings. The hope is that he can start and that, with focus on pitching, he can tighten up his control.

#5.152 – C, Wright State, Boston Smith

I think I’ve bounced back and forth in my respective mocks on how early to draft Smith. I’m steering into my hitting metric this time, and giving him closer to the value that my stat suggests. The lefty-hitting catcher with power is just too valuable.

#6.182 – RHP, UNCW, Zane Taylor

Similar to Boston Smith, with Taylor I’m steering into my pitching metric more this time. Taylor is another in that list of shorter starting pitchers that we’re dreaming on a Spencer Strider. On the year, Taylor went 1.98 ERA, 0.763 WHIP, 9.9 SO/9, 1.0 BB/9. At the combine he posted one of the top fastball velo’s at 97.7mph.

#7.212 – RHP, Abilene Christian, Dominick Reid

Reid I had in my previous mock. 6’3″/201lbs and a former transfer from Oklahoma State. Reid’s line was 3.26 ERA, 1.109 WHIP, 11.4 SO/9, 2.8 BB/9 in 15 starts this year. And then, at the Combine this week, Reid popped as one of the top performers in multiple pitch movement measurements. There’s some intriguing clay to mold here.

#8.242 – 3B, Cincinnati, Kerrington Cross

Most likely a senior sign, Cross has tremendous intangibles, and he’s no slouch in the on-field performance: .396/.526/1.173, 12 HR, 50 BB, 35 SO, 15 SB.

#9.272 – RHP, Baylor, Gabe Craig

Craig is the #1 relief pitcher in my metric, and he has some postseason awards on his resume that may make this way too late to get him. But at 6’5″/209lbs, with a 0.56 ERA, 0.500 WHIP, 14.3 SO/9, 0.8 BB/9 and 10 saves this could be a fast-mover in a system that needs more in-house pitching.

#10.302 – OF, Dallas Baptist, Nathan Humphreys

Humphreys first caught my eye with his glove. He’s got legit centerfield skills. And then his offensive line wasn’t too shabby either. He hit .353/.457/1.135 with 17 HR, 38 BB, 38 SO, and 21 SB.

#11.332 – LHP, Florida, Pierce Coppola

Coppola is a carryover from previous mocks, and we’re just trying to find the sweet spot between his present value where he’s a frequently-injured starting pitcher, his really strong performance when he HAS pitched, and the fact that he might be discounted due to his senior status (and injury history). But if you pick the right round, this could be insane value for an SEC starter.

#12.362 – RF, Kent State, Jake Casey

Casey is the son of Sean, the longtime MLB player, and he has put together a very solid college career in his own right. At 6’2″/190lbs, Sean hit .356/.500/1.236 with 17 HR, 20 SB last year. And he’s got an above-average outfield arm.

#13.392 – RHP, Vanderbilt, Sawyer Hawks

It felt like the Mariners tried to draft a handful of quick-moving, relief pitchers in the 2024 Draft. That effort seemed to sidetrack this year with injuries and/or underperformance. But it still could be a useful strategy going forward. Hawks is an Air Force Academy transfer listed 6’4″/215lbs. In 2025 he had a 1.60 ERA, 0.800 WHIP, 11.8 SO/9, 2.2 BB/9 and 8 saves in 18 appearances out of the Vandy bullpen. His fastball has been up to 95mph.

#14.422 – 1B, Austin Peay, Ray Velazquez

There were a bunch of interesting bats on this Austin Peay roster, but I came away having Velazquez as the highest on my hitting metric. At 6’1″/212lbs he hit .364/.479/1.207 with 18 HR, 32 BB, 32 SO in the college season, and he’s continued swinging it well across the first five games he’s played on the Cape where he’s sitting at a .389 average.

#15.452 – RHP, Coastal Carolina, Ryan Lynch

Lynch is the local product from Monroe, WA that has made his way all the way to the College World Series finals tomorrow. A pure reliever at 6’4″/234lbs, he has a 0.58 ERA, 1.032 WHIP, 10.2 SO/9, 2.9 BB/9 and 9 saves in 27 appearances.

#16.482 – 2B, UConn, Ryan Daniels

When doing a Mariner mock draft, I can’t help but think of it similarly to putting together a roster. After all, most of these guys will end up becoming the bulk of the low-A Modesto lineup later this summer. You kind of need a variety of guys so that you have most positions covered.

Daniels was one of the better second base options from my hitting metric. He posted a line of .365/.476/1.220 this year with 18 HR, 40 BB, 41 SO, and 10 SB for the Huskies.

#17.512 – LHP, UCSB, Hudson Barrett

Barrett was one of my most recent discoveries just in the last week after popping in the Combine with some of the higher-ranking pitch movement statistics on his secondary pitches. At 6’5″/225lbs, Hudson is a prototypical pitcher build, and his rate stats of 1.93 ERA, 0.643 WHIP, 9.6 SO/9 are solid. There is some question mark as to why he only threw 4.2 innings during the college season in three starts as an “opener”. In his summer league more recently, Barrett threw 4.0 innings of shutout ball.

#18.542 – C, Georgia State, Colin Hynek

I generally like to have two catchers in every mock. It’s too much of a specialty position to not get a couple. Hynek is a 6’1″/200lb backstop with an underwhelming .230/.396/.982 slash, but 18 HR and a solid catch and throw defensive profile.

#19.572 – RHP, Grove City CC, David Leslie

Leslie is another recent discovery after a strong performance in his first appearance out of the bullpen for his MLB Draft League team. Listed 6’3″/185lbs, his JUCO season line went: 2.05 ERA, 0.938 WHIP, 10.13 SO/9.

#20.602 – LF, Southern, Cardell Thibodeaux

Thibodeaux is quietly one of the best pure hitters in the country. He hit .439/.544/1.391 with 18 HR, 39 BB, 27 SO, and 24 SB during the college regular season, and he’s recently posting near-identical numbers in the Draft league at .423/.545/1.199 with 1 HR, 7 BB, 4 SO in 7 games so far. The downside is that he’s only 5’8″/175lbs and really only has one year of strong performance, and it came in the lower level Southwestern Athletic Conference.

Mariners June mock

By Jared Stanger

It’s becoming more and more commonly written and discussed that the 2025 MLB Draft is not very strong at the very top of the class. This is truly unfortunate because Seattle had previously seemed to get quite lucky to end up with the #3 overall pick this year in the draft lottery, when their earned draft position was closer to #15 overall. As I’ve been studying this draft class; I’m really struggling to find a guy that feels worthy of the third pick. In my previous mock, my thought was to try to find upside with that pick by drafting one of the high school players, but even that wasn’t super satisfying. Thinking like a football draft student…I really wanted to find a way to trade down the third pick. This isn’t allowed under the rules of the MLB Draft structure.

Then, a few days ago, I woke up at, like, 3:30 in the morning with this idea…

In the MLB Draft, if you don’t sign your draftpick in the first or second round; you will get to draft at the same slot plus one the following year. This means that the Mariners, if they don’t sign the guy they draft with the #3 pick next month, will be awarded the #4 overall pick in the 2026 Draft. So you would, ostensibly, be trading down one slot and one year.

The Mariners WILL NOT do this. No MLB team does this. The primary reason that teams don’t do this is that the signing bonus allotment for every team is aligned directly with the order of their picks, and in the top 10 rounds, the bonus allotment that coincides with a specific pick will be forfeited from their total bonus pool if they don’t sign the player at that slot.

In exact terms of the 2025 Draft…due to the high value of their lottery pick at #1.3, plus a compensatory competitive balance pick they were awarded at #1.35 overall, Seattle has ended up with the largest total bonus pool of all 30 MLB teams. This is only true if they sign all eleven of their picks in the top ten rounds. The M’s total bonus pool for the top ten rounds is: $17,074,400. The bonus pool assigned to the #3 pick alone is: $9,504,400. If the Mariners don’t sign whoever they end up drafting there; their bonus pool immediately shrinks to $7,570,000. This is a loss of 55% of their potential spending. And that pool can be spent in any way the team sees fit, as long as they sign someone at each draftpick. This new amount would take Seattle from the most bonus pool in MLB, to the fifth-worst bonus pool.

But here is where the conversation gets interesting. Seattle, in their 2025 season, are currently not playing to a level that they would make the playoffs. They are currently on pace to earn the #14 overall pick for the 2026 Draft. That pick would also be entered into the Draft Lottery for next year where they could win a pick in the top six or seven in that class. Seattle could, conceivably, end up with two picks in the top eight overall, and certainly two picks in the top fifteen. And, in baseball drafts, the talent level can swing wildly from year to year. Thirteen months away from the 2026 Draft, the early opinion is that next year’s class is easily better than this year’s.

If you followed this strategy…the 2026 Draft could be franchise (re)defining for the Seattle Mariners. And I think it’s worth doing.

So……in this mock draft, I am not terribly concerned with who we/Seattle drafts at #3. I think you draft a high school player, simply because they are the most likely to give the optics of being hard to sign away from their college commitment. It could be a college player…Kumar Rocker was recently an un-signed college player when he was drafted #10 overall in the 2021 Draft, he didn’t sign and returned to Vanderbilt, and then he signed after being picked with the #3 overall pick in the 2022 Draft. But, again, the optics will look better with a prep player.

#1.3 – RHP, Corona HS, Seth Hernandez

The top two high school players are IF Ethan Holliday and Hernandez, and there’s pretty good odds that one of the two will be available at #3. Righthanded HS pitching is notoriously the most-risky category to draft early, and Hernandez is one of the older players coming out of the prep class, as he will turn 19 on June 28th. Hernandez is currently, and ironically, committed to go to college at Vanderbilt. He may actually have a pretty high asking price to sign this year, so it would look believable if they didn’t end up signing him.

Again, the downside to this is, honestly, not the loss of a player at the third pick…the loss is the flexibility to make moves via overslot deals later on in the draft. They COULD still draft and negotiate to make those kind of picks happen, but it would be harder, and probably with less-talented players.

#1.35 competitive balance – RHP, Louisville, Patrick Forbes

To me, I look at Forbes as a guy that might actually be deserving of being picked with the #3 pick. There are four pitchers at the top of the college leaderboard in SO/9…three of the four are lefthanded. The #2 guy is a reliever that has enough innings to qualify for rate stats, and the #1 and #4 guys are Liam Doyle and Kade Anderson…two starters that are getting talked about as top five overall picks. So Forbes would be the steal of the group if actually acquired at #35.

Forbes is a 6’3″/220lb, well-built, former two-way player with athletic movements and already touching triple digits. And, counter to Seth Hernandez being old for a high school player, Forbes is young for a college draft-eligible player. Patrick will turn 21 on July 11 this year…two days before the first night of the draft. This probably matters for teams like Seattle. They drafted Jurrangelo Cijntje last year when he was only one month past his 21st birthday.

It’s a mild disappointment not to get a lefthander from our first pick, but just like the general consensus is trending toward “the top ten of this class is not strong”; the consensus also believes this class has decent depth and is strong in lefthanded pitching throughout.

#2.57 – LHP, Iowa, Cade Obermueller

Speaking of LHP…as I’ve been trying to formulate my backwards-forward draft modeling; in order to pass on the LHP that fill out the top 10 overall of this draft, I need to feel comfortable with who I can get later on. Obermueller is one of the guys I’ve landed on. He’s only listed 6’0″/170lbs, and he’s probably shorter in reality, but the stuff looks like a Seattle kind of guy. The fastball is up to 98mph, and there are other things in the profile that look like our analytics.

#3.91 – OF, George Mason, James Quinn-Irons

I hadn’t looked at JQI before I wrote my first Mariner mock last month, but once I did; I had to find a way to draft him. This is a guy that is 6’5″/230lbs, he plays a very strong defensive centerfield, he has hit 16 HR with 85 RBI in 61 games this year, he’s gotten on-base at a .523 clip, AND he’s stolen 36 bags in 43 attempts. That sounds like five tools to me.

Of all the touted Seattle prospects on our farm right now; there are almost no outfielders other than Laz Montes. If we could draft a fast-moving college outfielder now, by the end of the 2026 season, Randy Arozarena will be a free agent, and Victor Robles will have a club option to be picked up (or not).

#4.122 – RHP, Abilene Christian, Dominick Reid

Reid is a 6’3″/201lb righty starter that transferred from Oklahoma State to Abilene this year to, presumably, get more opportunity in the rotation rather than in the bullpen. He’s got a 3.36 ERA, 1.109 WHIP, 11.4 SO/9 in 15 starts.

#5.152 – RHP, Baylor, Gabe Craig

It’s kind of tough to find relief pitchers for the baseball draft because there are so many schools and even more pitchers, but no great way to filter for just relief innings. When I see any kind of reference to a good reliever; I try to make a note of the name to research him when I can, if not immediately. Craig is one of those names. Once I heard his name, I checked for his tape and his statline, and he was instantly the top reliever in my pitching metric. Listed 6’5″/209lbs; Craig has the prototypical build. His mechanics and stuff all looked good once I found some tape of him. The only yellowflag was that he will be 24 years old the week before the draft. I’m not sure this matters that much, as Seattle drafted a few over-aged college relievers just last year (including 24 y/o Charlie Beilenson in the 5th round). If we need to make some bonus slot room, this is the first spot we can save a good chunk.

#6.182 – 3B, Cincinnati, Kerrington Cross

Both Cross and Boston Smith would be candidates for underslot deals as potential senior-sign guys. I’ve basically ignored the prep players in this mock that might need overslot money, so I don’t really feel the need to worry about underslotting anyone either. Everybody is simply getting slot.

Cross is a 6’0″/215lb infielder that hit .396/.526/1.173 with 12 HR, 50 BB, 35 SO, and 15 SB this year. I’m, honestly, a bigger fan of his intelligence and leadership than his statline, and I still like his statline.

#7.212 – LHP, Florida, Pierce Coppola

I had Coppola in my previous mock, but his positioning might have been too high for his age and injury redflags. Plus, he was touched up a bit in his most-recent CWS start. In the 7th round, he looks more like Seattle’s 2024 draftee from the 11th round, Christian Little, who was also a once highly-touted pitcher from an SEC school whose college career never managed to take solid footing.

Coppola is a 6’8″/245lb southpaw whom has only managed a total of 49.1 innings pitched across his four-year college career, but whose stuff has earned him a 2.53 ERA, 0.984 WHIP, and 18.1 SO/9 when he has managed to pitch this year. If he falls this far, Coppola is the ideal type of high-reward player you’d love to get with a low-risk pick like this. He may end up a lights-out, high-leverage reliever and that will help him maintain his health.

#8.242 – C, Texas, Rylan Galvan

Behind Cal Raleigh there’s only Harry Ford and then Josh Caron as catchers on Seattle’s top 30 prospect list. So I’m spending another top 10 pick on a catcher. Galvan strikes me as a guy that our pitching staff will love to throw to. Great receiving/throwing/leadership skills. The bat is okay at .296/.452/1.065 with 15 homers last year.

#9.272 – RHP, Rice, Davion Hickson

I’ve been trying to look at some of the things that Seattle might have seen in 4th rounder Bryce Miller, 6th rounder Bryan Woo, 12th rounder Logan Evans that led them to draft them, and for them to make it to MLB in fairly short order. I don’t know that I have it nailed, but Hickson is a guy that popped for me as a potential pitcher in that vein. Listed 6’2″/208lbs with 3.82 ERA, 1.288 WHIP, and 11.1 SO/9 this year.

#10.302 – 2B, Georgia State, Kaleb Freeman

I had Georgia’s Robbie Burnett in a similar place in my previous mock, but after digging a bit deeper I realized that Burnett has primarily been playing LF this year for the Bulldogs. Freeman has been playing mostly 2B (with some RF) for Georgia State. He can switch-hit and for the year slashed .349/.504/1.236 with 16 HR, 61 BB, 57 SO, and 15 SB.

#11.332 – RHP, Vanderbilt, Sawyer Hawks

Hawks has a similar story to recent #1 overall pick Paul Skenes. Both started at the Air Force Academy, both transferred to an SEC school, both showed dominance in their respective roles for said SEC school. Hawks has been exclusively a reliever posting a 1.60 ERA, 0.800 WHIP, 11.8 SO/9 with 8 saves in 18 appearances.

#12.362 – 1B, Loyola Marymount, Beau Ankeney

This late in this mock, I’m kind of looking to fill some holes and draft some positions/profiles I may not have added up to this point. So I was looking for a 1B with some power and I found Ankeney. Listed 6’4″/235lbs, Beau built on a pretty solid 2024 season at Grand Canyon University after transferring to Loyola where he hit .358/.453/1.164 with 22 HR, 69 RBI, 30 BB, 53 SO in 57 games. His batspeed really caught my eye.

#13.392 – 3B, Austin Peay, Ray Velazquez

I had Velazquez in my previous mock. I’m moving him down a few rounds because I’m still not seeing him getting much buzz. He’s a senior-sign player that will be 23 in September. He was previously riding the bench for Vanderbilt, but transferred to Austin Peay to get more opportunity. And this year, with that opportunity, he hit .364/.479/1.207 with 18 HR, 32 BB, 32 SO.

#14.422 – LHP, St Joseph’s, Colton Book

I have two LHP that showed up back-to-back on my pitching metric with nearly identical profile. Book and Jordan Gottesman, from Northeastern, are both 22 year old lefthanded starting pitchers getting by more on pitchability than present stuff. But I like a guy that can control the zone that we can try to build the velo with.

Book’s 2025 went: 3.53 ERA, 0.992 WHIP, 12.7 SO/9, 2.1 BB/9. And he’s got the more prototypical pitcher frame at 6’4″/215lbs.

#15.452 – CF, Dallas Baptist, Nathan Humphreys

Another guy that is already 22 years old and a senior-sign. Humphreys plays a very strong defensive centerfield. He hit .353/.457/1.135 with 17 HR, 38 BB, 38 SO, and 21 SB. It’s a nice, well-rounded profile with a lefthand profile. After writing the bulk of this mock I found a new source that had Humphreys going way earlier than this, which makes sense. His profile shouldn’t last this long. But I can’t fit him in earlier in this version.

#16.482 – C, Wright State, Boston Smith

I had Smith in my previous Mariner mock, but in an earlier round. After seeing more of him during the CWS regionals, and not seeing his stock go up; I’ve decided to wait on him a bit. Listed 5’10″/195lbs; Smith has hit .330/.498/1.269 this year with 26 HR, 57 BB, 52 SO, and 16 SB. And he’s a lefty-hitting catcher. Like Humphreys, I would tend to think we need to pick him earlier than this.

#17.512 – RF, Kent State, Jake Casey

At this point, most draft big board listings have run out of players after naming 500. So I’m really just guessing approximate draft value from names that I pinned at some point and who aren’t listed in the 500.

My first choice in these last four is kind of a superstitious pick, of which most of the story I’m not going to get into. Suffice to say…Casey is a 6’2″/190lb lefty-hitting OF that hit .356/.500/1.236 this year with 17 HR, 37 BB, 56 SO, and 20 SB. He is also a legacy player being the son of former all-star 1B, Sean Casey.

#18.542 – RHP, Texas, Max Grubbs

Grubbs is a nice little reliever for the Longhorns. 6’1″/200lbs posting a 2.84 ERA, 1.123 WHIP, 9.6 SO/9, 2.2 BB/9 with 5 saves this year.

#19.572- RHP, Coastal Carolina, Ryan Lynch

Lynch is a bullpen piece for CCU with closer experience. He transferred there after stops in Bellingham and Bellevue Community College. Lynch is an Everett, WA native standing 6’4″/234lbs with a 0.59 ERA, 1.043 WHIP, 10.0 SO/9, 2.9 BB/9 and 8 saves season line.

#20.602- SS, Bryant, Drew Wyers

Seattle has a pretty strong farm system full of shortstop prospects, so I didn’t really make drafting one a priority. But it’s still important to draft one to fill out your minor league roster(s).

Wyers is listed 6’2″/200lbs and hit .407/.521/1.231 this year with 11 HR, 26 BB, and only 17 SO in 45 games.

And, since I “traded” away our first round pick for the #4 pick next year…here are some potential high-end 2026 draft targets:

UCLA SS Roch Cholowsky

Highschool SS Jacob Lombard.

Highschool SS Grady Emerson.

Highschool OF Brady Harris.

Georgia Tech OF Drew Burress.

Coastal Carolina RHP Cameron Flukey.

Florida RHP Liam Peterson.

Florida Atlantic LHP Trey Beard.

North Carolina draft-eligible sophomore RHP Ryan Lynch.

Highschool LHP Gio Rojas.

I already think that group looks better than 2025. Good luck getting Jerry Dipoto and crew to recognize this, and/or to have the stones to do it.

Mariners mock draft

By Jared Stanger

The MLB Draft is less than two months away, taking place this year July 13th-15th and this could, not unlike the 2025 Seahawk draft, become an organization-changing draft. The change began months ago when Seattle moved up from the 15th overall pick to the third overall pick in the draft thanks to the draft lottery. In addition, Seattle was awarded pick #35 at the end of the first round in the “Competitive Balance round”. These two high selections, and the slotted draft bonus pool that comes with them, have put Seattle into the driver’s seat as the team in all of MLB with the biggest allotment of draft bonus pool.

The Mariners will enter the draft with $17,074,400 in bonus pool. This will mean tremendous flexibility in how they manipulate their selections in July. They will be able to buy out higher caliber, and/or more, of this year’s best high school players from their college commitments by creating bonus surplus with selective underslot picks/signings. This could mean a higher upside draft than we’ve seen in the Dipoto era.

Certainly, we will see the highest overall draftpick in the Dipoto era. The previous high pick was 2020 when Seattle drafted Emerson Hancock at #6 overall. And it ties the highest pick the Mariners have made since 2012 when they drafted Mike Zunino at #3.

Now, unfortunately, there is a downside. I think all of these draft windfalls might be coming at a pretty bad time in terms of the quality of the draft. I, personally, don’t really love this draft class. There is no Paul Skenes, no Travis Bazzana at the top of the class. I don’t love the consensus top three players in most mock drafts. The top prep hitter, Ethan Holliday, feels stiff and unselective. The top prep pitcher, Seth Hernandez, has mechanics that I really don’t like. The top college pitcher, Jamie Arnold, is my favorite of the three, but even him I have questions on.

I would love to see Seattle go sort of unexpected and take a mild reach on someone at #3, sign him for underslot, and then attack their next few picks for upside. I think this might be a draft you consider taking three high school players in your top four picks.

Seattle needs more pitching prospects. The M’s recently became MLB’s richest farm system with nine unique players on the top 100 list, but the top seven of their nine are all position players. The two pitchers recently added are their top two picks from the 2024 Draft, Jurrangelo Cijntje and Ryan Sloan, and are ranked #92 and #96 respectively.

They may force pitching pick(s) early and often this draft. But I wouldn’t necessarily do that.

For those concerned with giving underslot deals to a player at #3…that’s not really historically relevant. Travis Bazzana was signed for underslot at #1.1 last year and Paul Skenes was signed for underslot at #1.1 two years ago. Max Clark was signed for underslot as a high school draftee at pick #1.3 also in 2023. It’s actually easier, and therefore more common, to go underslot when you draft early because the slotted money starts so much higher.

#1.3 – SS, Corona High School, Billy Carlson

A high school teammate of Seth Hernandez, Carlson is arguably the best defensive shortstop in the draft. He’ll definitely stick at short going forward. And I think his bat is underrated. He’s got more power than he’s credited with, and there could be more coming as he gains strength. He’s currently listed at 6’1″/185lbs.

Carlson doesn’t have the profile of 2019 #2 overall draftpick Bobby Witt Jr who had a thicker build and MLB bloodlines, but I feel like Carlson has the makeup to become a guy that is a multi-year all star and Gold Glover in the vein of Witt, Gunnar Henderson, or (my closest comp) Dansby Swanson.

Carlson is committed to Tennessee and he’s the #6 player on the MLB.com big board. If you draft him at #3, where the slot bonus is $9,504,400, but sign him for a value of $8.5mill, a value somewhere between the 4th and 5th pick, you’ll have another $1mill for later picks.

#1.35.CB – RHP, Louisville, Patrick Forbes

This is a very interesting pick location. You could try to flip your bonus savings from the first pick to a prep player that has slid down the draft due to signability requirements, you could treat this pick like your first pick from 2024 when you draft the best college righthander available at slot, or you could reach on a guy with lower ranking on national boards and just give him the bonus value at 35 that would be called overslot at 57. I’m kinda going with the middle option with Forbes.

Forbes is a 6’3″/220lb righthanded pitcher that won’t be 21 until two days before the draft. He was a two-way player his freshman year at Louisville, and so he’s technically only been focusing exclusively on pitching the last two years, and it’s only been 2025 that he’s been exclusively a starting pitcher. So there’s some reason to believe that his statline this year hides the fact that there’s still growth/upside to unlock in him.

At present, Forbes has used a repertoire featuring a fastball that is up to 100mph, that really explodes up in the zone, and a nasty slider, to strikeout over 14.00 per nine. His third pitch, a changeup, still needs work and more frequent use to stay in the rotation. But, at minimum, he should have a floor as an elite reliever a la Matt Brash.

The bonus for this pick is $2,758,300, and I’m probably trying to get Forbes for $2.5mill of that due to his young age and college eligibility still left.

If Seattle goes high school again here for an overslot deal…I prefer the bats including local product Xavier Neyens from Mount Vernon, MLB-legacy player Quentin Young (nephew of Delmon and Dmitri), or Sean Gamble. Neyens is a big-power, lefty hitting 3B. Young is probably a 3B as well, but has some of the best prep power from the right side. And Gamble reminds me a bit of Corbin Carroll, and probably profiles as a future OF that hits from the left side.

#2.57 – LHP, Johnson HS, Johnny Slawinski

I love this draft throughout for lefthanded pitching. I hope Seattle comes away with 3-4 pretty intriguing southpaws in the top 10 rounds. Slawinski is probably my favorite lefty from the high school group. He’s not the velo king of the group, but I just love the clean mechanics and the pitchability. At 6’3″/180lbs, there’s enough frame to add some velo as he gets stronger.

The slot value for this pick is $1,636,800 and I definitely think we need to go overslot to get him away from his college commitment to Texas A&M. Last year, Seattle drafted Ryan Sloan, the #19 player on the MLB board, at pick #2.55 overall. They signed him for $3.00mill…well above the slot of $1.64mill. It might take a similar figure to get Slawinski secured. We have $1mill surplus from the first pick, so we’ll need another $363k savings from any of our later picks.

#3.91 – RHP, Corona HS, Ethin Bingaman

This is the first pick that is a little harder to predict. Historically, Seattle has used their third round pick on multiple occasions to save some bonus money to channel to their earlier picks. This year, however, after going underslot at #1.3, we might be able to target another prep player that is still available and give him overslot here. But just who that player might be is the hardest part to predict.

The bonus allotment for #91 is $851,800. Draft signees love some good, round numbers, so if we can bump that amount up to $1.0mill, we could get another upside prep player. Ethin Bingaman comes from the same high school team as Carlson and Hernandez (and Brady Ebel). He reminds me a bit of Patrick Forbes only three years earlier in his development. He’s currently a two-way player, but I’m going to take him as a pitcher. 6’1″/200lbs and with a fastball that presently touches 95mph with ride.

#4.122 – C, Texas, Rylan Galvan

I’m pretty intentional when I look for catchers in these baseball mock drafts, and Galvan fits pretty closely to what I’m looking for. Listed 6’0″/205lbs, and hitting .299/.453/1.088 on the year with 14 HR and 46 RBI. He will be 22 years old in June, so there may be some wiggle room for bonus. I’m underslotting him about $117k.

#5.152 – LHP, Florida, Pierce Coppola

Coppola is an interesting case. He’s a 6’8″/245lb lefty starter that shows up as the #1 pitcher in my analytic study that I do every draft cycle. The problem is the guy has only made 15 appearances across four college seasons since 2022. He made one start in 2022, missed all of 2023, made 8 starts in 2024, and he’s currently at 6 starts this year. Huge medical redflags.

But when he’s been healthy, he’s been one of the toughest AB’s a college hitter can face. So we’re taking a calculated gamble here that our pitching program can unlock some way(s) to either keep him healthy, or simply recreate him as a dominant long-reliever, maybe closer. And, obviously, due to the risk, we sign him for only $400k…$61k underslot.

#6.182 – LHP, St Joseph, Colton Book

Another college lefty, Colton Book is a bit harder to find video of, but he popped in my pitching study as one of the best values in the draft. At 6’4″/210lbs he certainly looks the part on paper. He’ll be 23 years old in August, so we get him with some senior savings (~$50k). This year he has posted a 3.20 ERA, 0.931 WHIP, 12.6 SO/9 line across 80+ innings. Signing bonus: $300k.

#7.212 – 3B, Austin Peay, Ray Velazquez

After studying about 100 of the top draft-eligible college hitters; Ray Velazquez came out as one of this year’s top 10. And there is some pedigree here, as Velazquez played for Vanderbilt in 2024. This year, he’s hitting .377/.487/1.261 with 18 HR and 57 RBI. Another slight underslot signing at $250k due to age (23 in September).

#8.242 – 2B/OF, Georgia, Robbie Burnett

I don’t have much reason for the order I’m mocking most of these guys past the top 150 picks, as most big boards available via the media don’t currently go beyond 150. I have no reference point for how the industry sees some of these players. I’ve only passively used the thought: I value catcher over third base, third base over second base, etc.

Burnett has been a very strong player for the Bulldogs this year, hitting .318/.492/1.224 with 20 HR, 66 RBI, and 17 SB. He has split time on defense between (in order): right field, second base, left field, center field.

These last three picks I’m back on track bonus-wise to allow each to receive exactly slot.

#9.272 – RHP, Indiana, Cole Gilley

Gilley is an over-aged (almost 24) righthander that has mixed between 11 starts and 6 relief appearances, and sports a combined 3.88 ERA, 1.101 WHIP, 10.5 SO/9 over 62.2 innings.

#10.302 – C, Wright State, Boston Smith

Boston Smith is another catcher that ticks most of the boxes I’m looking for, but in this case he brings the bonus attribute of hitting lefthanded. A smaller physical backstop, Smith is 5’10″/195lbs and has hit .322/.494/1.222 with 21 HR, 60 RBI, and 15 SB.

Triple Mockiato

By Jared Stanger

TThe 2025 NFL Draft starts six days from today. I may squeeze in a final mock next week, but as players have been ascending/descending value as we get closer, I’ve been running through simulations to try to pin down best strategy and gameplan. In doing that, I thought it might be fun to show you three of those simulations to kind of show some of the similarities and some of the pivot points where we might try some different things.

For me, every mock begins with a trade down. I’m not convinced Schneider will do this. Sometimes you just can’t do the trade in reality because reality is: you need a willing trade partner. But I WANT this trade. Badly.

The first trade in the mock is: #1.18 to Philadelphia for picks #1.32 + #2.64 + #5.161. Philly has a really strong roster, they may not have many holes to fill, so the idea of moving up for a player may appeal to them. It’s very appealing to me to not be precious with the #18 pick because I think this is one of those years the first round isn’t awesome. I much prefer stacking picks on day two, and Philadelphia is one of the few teams you can get a first AND a second in trade back, and then the fifth just rounds out the values.

MOCK #1

#1.32 – DE, Ohio State, JT Tuimoloau

This is the starting point of all three of these mocks. It’s kind of just an educated hunch on my part. And that’s all I have to say about that…for now.

In this first version of these trio of mocks; I’m going to stick with our next pick at #2.50 and not trade up. I could see Seattle being aggressive this year on TE. I, personally, don’t like the value of a first round TE. Historically, those players aren’t the most elite at their position, and the sweet spot has actually been in the second to early third.

#2.50 – TE, Miami, Elijah Arroyo

Although Seattle has had Mason Taylor in for an official visit, it is Arroyo that pops in pretty much every analysis I’ve done for the position, especially when isolating for receiving vs blocking TE’s. And, actually, Arroyo doesn’t score terribly as a blocker.

We’ve heard rumors that Seattle is looking for a big bodied WR type after the departure of DK Metcalf, and I kinda think Arroyo should get some consideration in that category. His 16.86 yards per reception mark was #1 in the country for TE, and it was also top 50 in the country for all positions.

My only hesitation with this pick is that I do kinda get some Austin Sefarian Jenkins vibes from Arroyo. But that could have potentially been said about Travis Kelce and Rob Gronkowski when they were coming out of school. If Arroyo matures appropriately; we get a steal. If not…we might get a Netflix documentary.

As I’ve experimented with simulators with multiple trades; at some point I discovered I could accomplish much of what I was looking to do with fewer, bigger trades. One that I really came to like was Seattle trading pick #2.52 + #3.82 + #3.92 to Carolina, where former Seahawk scout Dan Morgan is the GM now, and the return to Seattle is #2.57 + #3.74 + #4.111 + #4.114.

The primary reason for this trade is: moving up in the third round, and I think we can afford to do it because I think there will be multiple options we will like at #2.57.

#2.57 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

There was a time when I wasn’t comfortable risking to wait on taking a QB. I recently came to better appreciation for Will Howard, and Seattle invited Jalen Milroe to a 30 visit, so they must have some comfortability with him. Now, having some level of comfort with a QB mix of: Jaxson Dart, Shough, Milroe, Howard…I think I feel safer waiting until this pick to draft one.

#2.64 – DT, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

Robinson has been a mainstay of my mock drafting this year, and one of my biggest challenges has been trying to move around the board with enough precision to still draft him as his stock has risen.

I’ve experimented with taking OL here and trying to get Robinson in the 3rd, but I’ve found this is the more consistent path to accomplishing my favored overall draft.

#3.74 – OC, Georgia, Jared Wilson

Do I think Wilson is still on the board this late? Not really. But if I’m given the option of pushing down the position that John Schneider openly hates, or pushing down the position that Seattle drafted as the first pick ever in the Mike Macdonald era; I’m pushing down the Center, and getting Ty Robinson earlier than the national media thinks.

#4.111 – RB, Miami, Damien Martinez

This is the biggest gap between picks in this mock (37 picks), and so when you finally get to the other side of it…you kind of have a bunch of things you want to pick. Fortunately, Seattle has two picks in a four-pick span.

It felt like, as I’ve experimented with multiple passes through simulations, the running backs I covet have more consistently been picked before I was able to get them. I’m currently looking at a group consisting of Martinez, DJ Giddens, and Bhayshul Tuten as targets with this pick. With the new OC; I’m not totally certain which kind of RB he prefers, and so this trio kind of represents some different “type” options. Tuten was really fast and ran a lot of zone concepts in college. Giddens is sort of mid-speed, mid-size and has the most shiftiness. Martinez is the biggest, slowest of the three, but also represents the most thumping, contact balance style.

#4.114 – WR, Washington St, Kyle Williams

The biggest change I’m consistently making in my mock drafts recently, is that I’m moving on from Dont’e Thornton. Between Arroyo at TE, and the two WR I’m bringing in with this mock; I kinda think I’m getting a better overall version of what Thornton is, and what DK was in aggregate, without some of the holes in their game, by going after receivers the way I am in this mock.

I’ve had Williams in prior mocks, and I’m coming back to him again now, after Seattle included him in their 30 official visits. He might be Doug Baldwin 2.0.

#4.137 – OL, Connecticut, Chase Lundt

Lundt was primarily the RT for Connecticut last year, but as I’ve been studying it…he’s actually kind of the poor-man’s version of Tate Ratledge in this class. Ratledge was almost 6’7″/308lbs at the Combine with 32 2/8″ arms…Lundt was 6’7 1/2″, 304lbs, with 32 5/8″ arms. Lundt may end up at guard with that arm length. I wouldn’t give up on him at RT, but his quicker path to play time might come as a guard.

#5.161 – CB, California, Nohl Williams

I really like this spot to draft a CB. If Seattle can get either Williams or Zah Frazier; I think we’ll have underrated options to usurp either Josh Jobe or Riq Woolen from the starting lineup, and we’ll get better as a defense at tackling from both of Williams/Frazier.

Williams is not the fastest CB available, but his personality profile kind of reminds me of Quandre Diggs but in a corner body. This guy has a ton of “fuck around and find out” to his vibe. Which Riq does not have. And I think Riq is not long for the roster under Macdonald.

#5.172 – LB, Ohio State, Cody Simon

To me, there isn’t a ton of logic to drafting a linebacker in the first three rounds, when your picks ideally are starters, after Seattle brought back Ernest Jones. Plus, this draft doesn’t have a good class of LB. The better logic is: get a backup with upside. In that regard, I’ve landed on Simon as my favorite option.

With multiple picks in quick succession at 172 & 175; I would like to move down 175 and add a couple picks in the sixth round. Trade #5.175 to the Chargers for picks #6.181 + #6.209.

#6.181 – WR, Arkansas, Isaac Teslaa

This might be my riskiest call. Not risky in terms of the player, but risky in terms of waiting so long to get him. I think Teslaa might be quietly an ascending player in real draft rooms. He’s a legit 6’4″/214lbs and ran a 4.43s forty, with great overall athletic testing. THIS, along with Arroyo’s running/receiving ability, is why my first WR pick for Seattle was 5’11”.

Teslaa might be poor man’s Emeka Egbuka. I have trouble picking Egbuka in the first round when our roster currently holds Jaxon Smith Njigba and Cooper Kupp, but getting Egbuka-lite in the 6th round is fine by me.

#6.209 – DT, Florida, Cam Jackson

I really have zero feel for what Seattle is doing with their open nose tackle spot with the absence of Johnathan Hankins. They aren’t bringing NT’s in for visits, so we can’t get a feel for their NT body type. Maybe they actually want to move forward with the combo of Byron Murphy and Jarran Reed getting their NT snaps.

Regardless, I think there are enough draftable NT in this class to at least take a flyer on someone late. I’ve got Jackson, Nazir Stackhouse, and Cam Horsley as options. Hell, if he falls far enough, get JJ Pegues back in the mix.

#7.223 – OL, Kansas, Bryce Cabeldue

In ten years, we may look back on this draft class and judge the success/failure of it based on Cabeldue. If they draft him, if they don’t, if he’s good, if he’s not. Cabes started all 12 Jayhawk games at Tackle last year, so he might be kind of a more athletic of Jake Curhan from a couple years ago. My research says his arms were measured 33 2/8″, which is borderline acceptable for an OT, but I could see him also becoming a pretty good OG. I might give him first shot at the LG opening.

#7.234 – RB, Texas Tech, Tahj Brooks

Honestly, I’m not sure how I ended up with this pick in this mock. I may have lost track of where I was in the mock, or which mocks I had got a RB. It’s not super important as it’s the last pick. This pick could be a second TE…it could be a third WR…it could be a safety, which I really haven’t found one I like.

In reality, it might be good to draft a fullback here, but most of the guys I’ve sort of passively studied for fullback aren’t even available in the simulation.

In these subsequent mocks; if a player matches up with the same player at the same pick as a prior mock; I’m not giving any commentary. I will only go into the new moves of each variation.

MOCK #2

Trade back #18 to Philly again.

#1.32 – DE, Ohio State, JT Tuimoloau

Now, at some point in the early 2nd round; I think it’s potentially likely that Seattle will trade up from one of their two picks. Because we added a 5th rounder from Philly; I am willing to package #50 plus one of their 5th rounders to move up six spots to try to cut in line for a certain player. I’ve found the highest I can trade up without using a 3rd or 4th round pick is to get to Dallas’ #44. So it goes: #50 + #175 to Dallas for #44.

#2.44 – CB, East Carolina, Shavon Revel

I’ve talked in the recent past that I kinda think Seattle is looking to draft a Corner earlier than we might realize with, basically, no turnover in the Corner room after last year. I think we might be prepping to FORCE some turnover. So we need reinforcements. I really like Revel. I hated when he got hurt, but at the same time, his injury is the only reason he’s potentially still on the board here.

He measured at the Combine 6’2″/194lbs with 32 5/8″ arms. Legit big corner size. Reports are that he’s got low 4.40 speed when healthy. His injury was an ACL, which could be concerning, but Seattle did bring him in for a 30 visit so that they could get their own doctors to give him a physical.

This pick FEELS more like what Seattle wants to do than my personal projection of Nohl Williams.

Again, we do the big trade with Carolina for multiple pick swaps.

#2.57 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

#2.64 – DT, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

#3.74 – OC, Georgia, Jared Wilson

#4.111 – TE, Oregon, Terrance Ferguson

After Arroyo, Ferguson might be the second-best receiving TE in this draft. Some of his metrics stack up really favorably with some of the best TE in the NFL currently. This would be a great value if he’s still on the board.

#4.114 – RB, Miami, Damien Martinez

#4.137 – OL, Connecticut, Chase Lundt

#5.161 – WR, Arkansas, Isaac Teslaa

In this version of a mock, Kyle Williams was not picked in favor of the TE earlier, so I’m using an earlier pick on Teslaa. Which, honestly, feels like a more probable range for Teslaa to be picked.

#5.181 – LB, Ohio State, Cody Simon

#6.209 – DT, Florida, Cam Jackson

#7.223 – OL, Kansas, Bryce Cabeldue

#7.234 – WR, Kansas, Quentin Skinner

As I wrote earlier, I’m moving on from Dont’e Thornton in all mocks. I think his price has gotten too high for what he is. He’s not a complete player. And that seemed more palatable when I was getting him in the 5th round.

Quentin Skinner is kind of poor-man’s Thornton. At 6’4″/195lbs, he’s a bit skinner than Dont’e, and his pro day speed was reportedly more in the 4.51s range when Thornton ran laser-timed 4.30s flat. But Skinner gives you similar skillset. He ranked #3 in the country in yards per catch (Thornton was #1). I really like Skinner’s willingness to give up his body for the catch. I really like who Skinner is between the ears. Drafting him at this range, maybe you sneak him onto the practice squad for the year, but in 2026 he slots nicely into a replacement for MVS.

MOCK #3

We’re starting with a similar thought process, but a slightly different trade. I don’t think this is nearly as plausible as the Philly trade, but I ran it through the simulator and the results were just too good not to wish on.

This time I’m going to trade #18 to Buffalo for picks #1.30 + #2.62 + #4.132. Buffalo has three picks in quick succession in the fifth that go: 169, 170, 173. I think adding one of those instead of a fourth is more likely. And, really, I could have done this structure with Philly for their fourth rounder at #134. I kinda like the pivot to Buffalo because their second round pick is a little higher than Philly, but also…Buffalo begins the draft with ten total picks to Philly’s eight. Buffalo might be more willing to move around the board.

#1.30 – DE, Ohio State, JT Tuimoloau

Same trade with Dallas to move up.

#2.44 – CB, East Carolina, Shavon Revel

#2.57 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

#2.62 – DT, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

#3.74 – OC, Georgia, Jared Wilson

#4.111 – WR, Washington State, Kyle Williams

#4.114 – TE, Oregon, Terrance Ferguson

#4.132 – OL, Connecticut, Chase Lundt

#4.137 – WR, Arkansas, Isaac Teslaa

#5.181 – LB, Ohio State, Cody Simon

#6.209 – DT, Florida, Cam Jackson

#7.223 – OL, Kansas, Bryce Cabeldue

#7.234 – DS, Wisconsin, Hunter Wohler

I really don’t love this Safety class, so I haven’t really spent much time forcing a pick there. Seattle has Julian Love and Coby Bryant returning. They signed D’Anthony Bell in free agency. I feel okay pushing safety down, if not off, the board.

Really, for this particular mock, I should have done running back here. Actually, a fullback might be the most realistic call.

Wohler has some interesting traits and production on his resume. He could be a nice special teams player out of the gate, and you see if you can develop him.

Ultimately, these mocks aren’t that different, and that is by design. There really shouldn’t be wild swings in variation. Not if you have a plan. There are a couple inflection points. In the second round…trade up or stand pat? In the second round…CB or TE? In the fourth round…which offensive skill position(s) do you take and which order?

There’s also player alternates for many of these picks. QB at #57…if Shough is gone, I think the current thought is Will Howard next. If you miss on Ty Robinson…the next guy at that profile might be a Jordan Burch or Saivion Jones. I talked about Zah Frazier being alternate to Nohl Williams. I talked about the running back alternates. Jalin Conyers is still of great interest to me if you miss on Ferguson. Teddye Buchanan is alternate to Cody Simon at LB.

If I had to choose one of these mocks as my #1 goal…of course it’s Mock #3. The luxury of having an extra 4th instead of an extra 5th allows me to get Kyle Williams, Terrance Ferguson, AND Isaac Teslaa. That’s beautiful, to me.

The negatives of Mock 3 are: 1) no running back. I’m like 90% sure John and Mike draft a running back at some point in this strong RB class. 2) I really don’t like pushing Jared Wilson into the third round. Maybe I should have used one of the 2nd’s on him, and tried to get Zah Frazier as my CB later on instead of Revel. In some ways that makes more sense with Revel’s injury, and Frazier’s full athletic testing. If healthy…I like Revel better, but it’s a big question. It sort of feels like the 2018 draft…Seattle drafts Rashaad Penny at #1.27 over Nick Chubb (#2.35) because Penny had immaculate medicals, and Chubb was coming off injury, but Chubb ended up the more productive career player by almost 5000 rushing yards.

The big question on all of these mocks is: what do you do with nose tackle? I think Seattle has been hiding something in their official visits. One of those things, I presume, is interior offensive line. I think there are clean prospects in that group that have allowed them, somewhat, to stay away. But the other spot is nose tackle. I just have a weird hunch that we’re all kind of disregarding an early pick on nose tackle too easily in the last month. Maybe Kenneth Grant, maybe Derrick Harmon, but the guy I’m super-intrigued by is Tyleik Williams. He feels like a guy that makes so much sense on paper, but who is never really connected to Seattle. And then they pick him and everybody is like, “whoa, didn’t see that coming.”

Tyleik, like Shavon, would make total sense as a target of the trade up scenario with Dallas. So maybe let’s start seeing that coming.

Seahawks March mock

By Jared Stanger

The NFL announced this year’s compensatory picks yesterday, so the official draft board is all but set (pending the known trades becoming official at beginning of the official league year at 1pm PST today). The Seahawks ended up with some good news: ending up with comp picks in the 4th, 5th, and 5th instead of the projected 4th, 5th, 6th.

The draft board now stands at:

#1.18
#2.50
#2.52
#3.82
#3.92
#4.137c
#5.172c
#5.175c
#6.185
#7.234

So they have ten picks. I really, really want thirteen picks. I know this is improbable…John Schneider has never had more than eleven picks in a single year…but I’m still going to make the moves that get me there.

With the addition of a 2nd rounder from the DK Metcalf trade, and a 3rd rounder in the Geno Smith trade; Seattle has the luxury of how they value trading back their first pick. The way I see the board, I think they don’t need to add a 2nd. Instead, I’ve taken a trade that allows them to add two in the 3rd. I think this draft is very strong into the beginning of day three, or the end of the 4th round. Third round picks are very valuable.

The trade is #1.18 to Kansas City for their picks #1.31 + #3.66 + #3.95.

Trades in the actual draft are harder to execute than they are in draft simulators, so I tried to limit myself to only two trades. The second deal sends #3.92 to Carolina for their picks at #4.111 and #4.114.

#1.31 – DE, Ohio State, JT Tuimoloau

Schneider has given the line about IOL getting over-drafted and over-paid…then, in recent media interviews, he’s kinda only digging in on that philosophy…and he really hasn’t paid any of the free agent OL this week, so I think we take him at his word and don’t use a first round pick on IOL.

There has been zero chatter in quite some time about Tuimoloau, and his draft stock in the media is actually 20-25 picks lower than this. Part of my strategy in this mock is to overdraft, basically, everyone so that I can repeat the results in the simulator.

JT had one of the most productive seasons of all DE in the class. We don’t have athletic testing yet, but his Combine weigh-in has him at 6’4″/265lbs with 33 3/4″ arms. One quick aside on all Combine arm length measurements that will be included in this piece: for whatever reason the Combine listed shorter arm measurements for most players that were also measured at the Senior Bowl by about a half-inch. I’m tending to give everyone that additional length back. So JT becomes 34 1/4″.

Seattle recently cut Dre’mont Jones and re-signed Jarran Reed. It currently feels like there are more snaps that will be available at DE than DT with Big Cat and Murphy returning at DT while Nwosu is an injury question mark at DE, so I’m feeling like the early pick will be weighted to going DE.

#2.50 – OG, Georgia, Tate Ratledge

I believe, if memory serves, I had Ratledge as a Seattle pick in my mock going back to October 2024. I went away from that some while he was recovering from an injury, but after his strong showing at the Combine, let’s get back in the Ratledge business.

He’s 6’7″/308lbs with 32 1/4″ (**32 3/4″) arms and ran a 4.97s forty with great explosivity in the jumps. And the tape was always good.

#2.52 – OC, Georgia, Jared Wilson

I’m resigned to the idea that there is only one true college center that is worth drafting in this class, and it is Wilson. There are some OT or OG college players that may move in to Center, but Wilson is the only one that played there last season. As of when I’m writing this, Seattle has missed out on Drew Dalman and Ryan Kelly in free agency. You can make the argument that 2024 draftpicks Christian Haynes and Sataoa Laumea’s play may improve with the hiring of Klint Kubiak, and moving to more of a zone blocking scheme. I’m not sure the same applies to Olu Oluwatimi. They need to prioritize Center in the draft.

Weighing in at 6’3″/310lbs with 32 3/8″ (**32 7/8″) arms, Wilson ran the fastest forty time of all OL at 4.84 seconds. And, really, the more I dig into him the more I want him on the team. If Seattle can’t add a veteran leader at Center, it might be a bit of a hack to add two guys from the same college OL that already have pre-existing chemistry.

#3.66 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

Yes, Seattle just signed Sam Darnold. I really think that’s the Matt Flynn half of the Flynn/Russell Wilson double move from the 2012 offseason. The bigger question, to me, is “who is Schneider’s guy?” Shough is MY guy, but I’m not convinced he will be Schneider’s. Some other possibilities would be Riley Leonard, Will Howard, Quinn Ewers. I would hate for it to be Ewers, and I’d be more indifferent to Leonard or Howard.

Shough is the old man of this QB class, and I’m sure people look at his career and want to tag him with the “injury-prone” label, but each of his injuries was a broken bone. It has not been soft-tissue, knees, etc. A broken bone is kind of a bad luck injury. And Shough had three of them.

But at the Combine Shough went in to Indy, measured one of the bigger-framed QB’s at 6’5″/219lbs, he competed in all of the tests outside of agility runs, and his numbers there were quite good with a 4.63s forty, 32″ vert, and 9’09” broad jump. His throwing session was also, arguably, the second-best behind Jaxson Dart in terms of accuracy, but probably a tick better than Dart if you consider arm strength.

#3.82 – DL, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

I’ve had two DT in just about every mock I’ve put out in the last 3-4 months: Ty Robinson and JJ Pegues. In this draft, after they brought back Jarran Reed, I’m forcing myself to make a call and only keep one of my guys. I’m going with Robinson for his better passrush. Pegues I think can pressure the QB, but ultimately he’s more of a run-defender, and when he showed up at the Combine at only 309lbs (down from listing at Ole Miss of 325lbs), and only ran a 5.15s forty…I think we can find a nose tackle later on.

Robinson also cut weight pre-Combine to 288lbs at 6’5″, but Robinson ran the fastest forty time of all DT at 4.83s. He’s got position versatility, especially if he stayed at 288, so he could be a replacement for Dre’mont Jones, or he can pair with Leonard Williams at DT for 3rd down passing situation NASCAR packages, etc.

#3.95 – CB, California, Nohl Williams

I feel like people are saying they like this cornerback class. I do not. Lots of short-armed, pretty skinny guys. There are literally two CB that I find draftable after the 1st round. I’m very much forcing this pick to get my “1A” guy.

Williams is 6’0″/199lbs with only 30 3/4″ (**31 1/4″) arms, and he ran only a 4.50s forty with just modest scores in the jumps. But, on tape, Williams is a very productive corner who posted 7 INT and 9 PBU last year. He’s a pretty aggressive player, he tackles well, but I’m just hesitant on him cause I’m sort of reading his personality with a bit of a darkness to him. Which we’ve seen Seattle bring in with Richard Sherman, Brandon Browner, Earl Thomas. Those were the guys that were productive, but you could also throw in, like, the Malik McDowell’s of their history. Can he be regulated? If I’m even reading him correctly.

#4.111 – OT, Connecticut, Chase Lundt

Possibly the first question mark pick, in terms of position, in this mock. Does Seattle need an OT? Starters Charles Cross and Abe Lucas will be returning for the final years of their rookie deals (Cross eligible for 5th year option), and they made a minor free agent move to sign Josh Jones as a swing OT/OL. Also, is Lundt even an OT in the pro’s? His Combine found him to have 32 5/8″ arms. Even with the conversion I’m using, he would still be sub-34″ at 33 1/8″.

I would just like to see them get a young guy, with four years of club control, in a draft that is strong with (especially) RIGHT tackles, that they can stash behind two guys on the last year of their deals. And, similar to getting two Georgia guys in the 2nd, Lundt could have some immediate chemistry with his college teammate from 2023, Christian Haynes. Mini-hack.

#4.114 – LB, Ohio State, Cody Simon

Ernest Jones was re-signed last weekend, so I backed down a bit from drafting a linebacker earlier in the draft, while still targeting a player with some traits that I’m looking for. Simon did not test at the Combine, but weighed in at 6’2″/229lbs. I wish he was more in the 235lb range, but with a 6’2″ frame, maybe he can add weight as we go.

He was a pretty productive player for the Buckeyes with 112 tackles, 12.5 TFL, 7.0 sacks, and 7 PBU in 15 games last year.

#4.137 – WR, Washington State, Kyle Williams

This might be another point in this mock where my draft philosophy will strongly contrast from Schneider. I could easily see John draft a WR earlier than this. After losing Tyler Lockett and DK Metcalf, it would make a lot of sense. I, personally, just see that there are some sneakier WR upside players that they could try to find later on. We could draft the Jaxon Smith Njigba player (again), or we could try to find the Puka Nacua player from the same class.

Williams is a 5’11″/190lb receiver that ran a 4.40s flat forty at the Combine after posting season totals of 1198 yards and 14 TD. Check out the video vs likely top 5 overall pick Travis Hunter:

#5.172 – WR, Arkansas, Isaac Teslaa

I really didn’t study Teslaa until the last week-10 days when I was doing some further diligence on the whole WR class. If you want to push a position group down your board, you need to know all of the options available later on.

Teslaa measured 6’4″/214lbs at the Combine and ran a 4.43s forty. His jumps were very strong, but what really caught my eye was the fact that he ran a 6.85s three-cone and a 4.05s shuttle, the latter of which was 1st amongst WR.

He actually played primarily the slot for Arkansas last year, and his agility scores aren’t that different from Cooper Kupp (6.75 cone, 4.08 shuttle).

#5.175 – TE, Texas Tech, Jalin Conyers

Necessity is the mother of invention, and similarly when you need to push a position down your board, you actually can make interesting discoveries. I think there’s a ton of reason that Seattle might take a TE earlier than this…I really like Terrance Ferguson, and he tested very well…but I found multiple data points that started pointing me towards Conyers, and therefore getting to take advantage of drafting other positions earlier.

Jalin measured 6’4″/260lbs with 33 1/4″ (**33 3/4″) arms at the Combine, and ran an acceptable forty time of 4.74s, but led all TE in the shuttle (4.27s) and the three-cone (6.94s) while also placing top four in group in both jumps.

He’s also kind of bargain basement Tyler Warren in the sense that Conyers was a Swiss Army knife player for Texas Tech, with 8 carries and 2 TD rushing, and 1 pass attempt and 1 TD throwing the ball. In 2023 he had 22 rushing attempts. Could this be Seattle/Kubiak’s 2025 version of Taysom Hill?

#6.185 – DT, Georgia, Nazir Stackhouse

As I talked about earlier, I found it necessary to start looking at lower-cost options for the nose-tackle replacement for Johnathan Hankins. I’ve settled on Stackhouse. He didn’t have much production this year, but at the Combine he measured 6’4″/327lbs with 32 1/2″ arms (**33″), and ran 5.15s in the forty. It was the same forty time Pegues ran, but Stackhouse is about 20 pounds heavier.

#7.234 – S, Wisconsin, Hunter Wohler

I literally ran this mock draft through a simulator earlier today to get a feel for if it could work. I was honestly looking to spend this pick on a third WR in Dont’e Thornton. Thornton was off the board, and although I had some other players in mind with a similar skillset to Thornton, I think they might also be available as undrafted free agents. I decided to pivot to something totally different. Then, a couple hours after running through the simulator and missing on my WR3, news came out that Seattle is signing Marquez Valdes Scantling. Perfect. They can push the Thornton profile to UDFA.

(For the record, MVS is 6’4″/206lbs and ran a 4.37s forty coming out of college. Thornton is 6’5″/205lbs and ran 4.30s…so that’s the right profile, I think. My UDFA target will be Quentin Skinner from Kansas. Listed 6’5″/195lbs, but he wasn’t invited to the Combine, so we’re waiting for his pro day to get more intel.)

I think Seattle needs a safety more than most people that follow the team. They cut Rayshawn Jenkins leaving Julian Love and Coby Bryant as the incumbents. I think Wohler brings a different element than both of those guys at 6’2″/213lbs (he played at 218lbs for Wisconsin). He only ran a 4.57s forty, but Julian Love only ran 4.54s, and former Macdonald safety in Baltimore, Kyle Hamilton, only ran 4.59s.

Wohler had 71 tackles in 11 games last year from the safety spot, after finishing with 120 tackles in 13 games in 2023. He’s a very high-floor player, to me. Bring him in at low cost, develop him at whatever pace you need to without the demand of having to start immediately…use him on special teams, etc…and see if maybe he might end up like a Talanoa Hufanga, who was drafted in the 5th round and went on to be a pro bowler.

I really like how this draft is able to unfold after acquiring those additional picks in trade. The draft should have a ton of flexibility. And I already liked how this class of players stacked up for what Seattle needs to add. I’m excited.

Mock simulator draft

By Jared Stanger

It’s fun every once in a while to run your draft thoughts through a simulator. It can give you in real-time a sense of players that are moving up, guys that are cooling off, places in the draft where particular position groups may bunch up, and certainly it’s an easy way to look at potential draft trades. Because trades are so easy, I have self-imposed some trade rules: 1) I’ve given myself a max of 4 trades per mock, 2) I’m not allowed to accept any computer offered trades. When the simulator creates the trade offer(s), the value is sometimes overly beneficial to the player. AKA…they’re unrealistic.

I like to make all of my trades before I even start the simulator. This allows me to just focus on the board and the players still on it. So here is what those trades looked like:

I’ve done a lot of mocking and have found 13 picks would be amazing to be able to get to, but I think one of those would have to come from the trade of a player on the current roster. Obviously, I can’t make those kinds of trades in these simulators, but also that trade doesn’t really feel like it’s coming. Certainly not at the highest end of the quality on the roster (meaning DK Metcalf).

We’ve heard multiple times now that this particular draft class may only have 16-20 first round graded players. I believe it was Daniel Jeremiah who said that the difference between pick #20 and pick #40 is minimal. And then he even expanded on that to say that it might be #18 to #45. I like trading back this draft. I like the amount of talent that should be available on day two particularly, and I think, with the salary cap situation John Schneider still has work to do on, we kind of need to plan on trying to fill most of the roster holes via cheap, draft players rather than vet free agents, which everyone seems to be throwing around carelessly (and unrealistically). With those thoughts in mind, I’ve traded entirely out of the 1st round.

#1.39 – DE, Ohio State, JT Tuimoloau

After months of sort of continually mocking Seattle to draft a speed, edge rusher, which this draft is rife with; I’ve recently come around to realizing, I think the idea of DE target should be a bit bigger bodied player. I’m talking 265-275lbs rather than 245-260lbs. Tuimoloau is listed 6’5″/269lbs, and was one of the most-productive DL in the country. He did it on the national champion team, and he got better and better as the Buckeyes got into the playoffs and were facing the best teams in the country.

To recognize that I’m not drafting the best OL still on the board, a couple thoughts: whatever cap space Schneider is able to open up should be spent on a free agent OL, and specifically a center. This OL needs a leader, and I think the no-doubter best leaders in the draft are gone by Seattle’s pick. Secondly, I think the scheme we’re likely walking into can make due with lesser overall talent.

#2.62 – LB, South Carolina, Demetrius Knight

It currently feels like the consensus around town is that Seattle won’t need a linebacker this early because they will bring back Ernest Jones. I’m not so sure. I think this might be kind of the Drew Lock situation from last year, the team sincerely wants to bring the guy back, but the player doesn’t necessarily want to return. Plus, he might be able to get more money going to a team that has actual, you know, cap space.

The draft is not strong at linebacker, so if they want to draft one, they need to do it early-ish. Knight has been a favorite of mine for months now, and he’s done nothing but climb throughout the season and postseason. Up next for him is the combine, which may really open some people’s eyes on him.

#3.72 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

I’ve given up on the idea that Geno Smith will be cut/traded, but by no means does that mean I think Seattle won’t draft one, and that draftee may end up starting sooner than people realize. It may be a variation of the Matt Flynn situation. Seattle NEEDS to get the ball rolling on a successor to Geno. This draft has a number of guys that won’t cost a 1st round pick, but have the potential to fall into the Geno/Russell/Kirk Cousins/Jalen Hurts/Dak Prescott category of QB talent.

As Jaxson Dart has entered the conversation of 1st round QB, maybe even the 2nd QB off the board, I’m already prepared to pivot to Shough, who I think has been very underrated all year. His arm-talent is pretty well-recognized, but I also think his running ability is underrated.

#3.82 – OG, Iowa, Connor Colby

The climb up draft boards has already begun for Colby, and I think it will take another large step after the Combine. A natural right guard, that would be where he slots in for Seattle.

#3.86 – CB, California, Nohl Williams

It took me a long time to sort of self-realize it, but I think CB is a bigger need on this team than I had been thinking during the season. I think Riq Woolen is overrated, and at minimum inconsistent. Jackson Jobe finished the year as a starter, but clearly he can be upgraded. And Devon Witherspoon can’t seem to get out of the slot because the team likes him closer to the snap.

Nohl Williams is rad, and that’s all I have to say about that.

#3.90 – DL, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

Robinson is a long-time holdover from my mocks all year. The cliffs notes: positional versatility (including fullback), smart, tough, productive.

#4.108 – DL, Ole Miss, JJ Pegues

Rinse and repeat. I want the duo of Robinson and Pegues to become staples of the Macdonald defense for a decade. It also would be rad to have Robinson lead-block for Pegues in wildcat.

#4.131 – OT, UConn, Chase Lundt

It’s been tough to gauge where the league is valuing Lundt. I feel like this is too low, but it worked in the mock simulator. Lundt gives us an immediate replacement for free agent Stone Forsythe, and also a legit hedge for Abe Lucas’ knee.

#4.137 – TE, Oregon, Terrance Ferguson

If we’re keeping Metcalf, which we apparently are, I think the bigger draft capital probably goes to the tight end room than wide receiver.

#5.173 – TE, Georgia Tech, Jackson Hawes

It only came to me this week…it’s a pretty good TE draft class…draft two. There are high-end TE that would be interesting in Warren and Arroyo, but there’s also a good number of midround guys. If not Ferguson, or Hawes, I also think Jalin Conyers makes sense for Klint Kubiak who just came from the team where Taysom Hill was the Swiss army knife player.

Ferguson is a nice receiving TE, who can block a little. Hawes is a great blocking TE, who can receive a little. Conyers is a jack of all trades. Get two of them.

#6.187 – OL, Jacksonville State, Clay Webb

I honestly think the move for Seattle won’t be signing Drew Dalman to play center, but they might go after Ryan Kelly on a smaller deal. But behind him, I like the idea of Webb getting a soft-landing without expectation of needing to start immediately, so he can take some time to get back in the habit of playing Center, where he spent most of his time playing in high school.

#6.212 – WR, Washington State, Kyle Williams

I only, very recently, got to looking into Williams, and as I said on twitter, he reminds me of Doug Baldwin. That would be a great type of player to add this late.

#7.236 – WR, Tennessee, Dont’e Thornton

With all of the talk of Tyler Lockett being a cap casualty; I think Seattle needs to do something at WR. Getting two guys with the upside of Williams and Thornton, and who each have unique size and traits; you could, at minimum, replace Lock in the aggregate.

If there’s one thing this mock is egregiously missing…it would be a running back in a strong running back class. It’s always good to draft from the strength(s) of the class, but in this class we have good OL, good DL, good TE, and good RB. We double-dipped, if not triple, on three of the four of those. And there’s a chance you can find one that makes the roster out of rookie free agency.

Total draft:

Post Senior Bowl mock

By Jared Stanger

We’re just beyond the finish of the week-long Senior Bowl practice and game, the Seahawks have some additional coaching additions on the heels of the Klint Kubiak hire, and so I wanted to get down on the record some adjustments to my most recent Seahawk mock draft.

Most of this comes from running my overall thoughts through an online mock draft simulator just to add some additional levels of cross-checking. I still think a good way of fixing some of the cap issues, while adding capital, is to trade DK Metcalf. I think there are a lot of teams that have cap space for an expensive player, have draftpicks to trade, need a WR1, and in a time when the draft may not have many high-end WR to be found. So, I think that trade still makes sense. Will John Schneider have the stones to do it? That is pretty doubtful, in my mind.

Instead of including the draft capital from trading DK, I’ve over-traded within the simulator. I have five trades that I made. I keep coming back to the idea that we want to come out of this draft with 13 draftpicks. That’s another unlikely outcome. I think I looked and the maximum players Schneider has picked in a single year is 11. Here are the trades:

#1.18 to Baltimore for their picks #1.27 and #2.59. I think Baltimore and Detroit make for the best trade-back partners as the value of the 18 pick should allow us to also get the late-2nd round pick from either of those teams.

There has been some media coverage of the idea that this draft there probably aren’t that many true 1st round talents. Daniel Jeremiah recently tweeted that there won’t be much different between the 20th player picked and the 40th player picked. So, once you’re down to 27, you might as well go down again. I trade pick #27 to Kansas City for pick #1.32 and #3.96.

Personally, I like the talent available in the 3rd round, maybe down into the top 120 overall. I’m gonna look to acquire as many 3rd round picks as I can. I move pick #1.32 to Arizona for pick #2.47 plus #3.78.

The fourth trade sends pick #2.50 to New England for picks #3.69, #3.77, and #4.105. And the fifth pick sends #3.96 to San Francisco for pick #3.99 and #4.112.

Final board has the Seahawks completely move out of the 1st round, but end up with 14 picks. Obviously, that’s even too many picks for what I intended to do, and if we make the DK trade we don’t need that much movement within the draft. But here is the players I end up with all of that draft capital.

Draft board: #2.47, #2.59, #3.69, #3.77, #3.78, #3.82, #3.99, #4.105, #4.112, #4.137, #5.173, #6.187, #6.212, #7.236

#2.47 – DE, Boston College, Donovan Ezeiruaku

In past mocks, I’ve had Seattle draft OL in the 1st round and take a safety, Nick Emmanwori, with an early pick. I’m not sure John Schneider would do the former, and the latter was openly a luxury pick. I’ve kind of cut the fat a bit in this early part of this mock.

Edge is a strong group in this draft class, and it’s good draft practice to take players from the positions of strength in any given year. It’s still not totally clear if Mike Macdonald wants to employ a 6’2″/248lb edge rusher like Ezeiruaku. In 2023 with Baltimore, Macdonald had a diverse cast of DL. Nnamdi Madubuike was 6’3″/305lbs (65% defense snaps), Jadeveon Clowney was 6’5″/266lbs (57% snaps), Kyle Van Noy was 6’3″/255lbs (42% snaps), Michael Pierce at 6’0″/355lbs (55% snaps), etc.

In 2021, when Macdonald went to Michigan to DC, he had Aidan Hutchinson at 265lbs, David Ojabo at 250lbs, Mazi Smith at 326lbs, Mike Morris at 278lbs. Again, a high variance of bodytypes, but these weren’t necessarily players that Macdonald had a hand in recruiting.

So it remains to be seen exactly what structure Macdonald would choose in his DL room given the time and resources to build them to his ideal. What I do know is that when you study the history of edge rushers; one of the predictive traits historically is pointing towards a group of players this year that includes Abdul Carter, Mike Green, Ezeiruaku, Landon Jackson, Bradyn Swinson, and Oluwafemi Oladejo. I like the value of EZ in the 2nd over Green in the 1st or Swinson in, say, the 3rd.

Donovan isn’t the tallest guy in the group at 6’2″, but his arm measurement at the Senior Bowl was 34.5″ with over a 6’10” wingspan. The NFL leaders in sacks in 2024 included Nik Bonitto at 240lbs (#2.64), Van Noy at 255lbs (#2.40), Micah Parsons at 245lbs (#1.12), TJ Watt at 252lbs (#1.30), Andrew Van Ginkel at 242lbs (#5.151), Will Anderson at 243lbs (#1.3), and Will Mcdonald at 236lbs (#1.15). Those were all top 15 in sacks. That’s 47% of the top passrushers in the league were under 255lbs last year, and 20% were drafted in the 2nd round or later.

On the current Seahawk roster, Derick Hall is 254lbs, Dre’mont Jones is 281lbs, Boye Mafe is 261lbs, Uchenna Nwosu is 265lbs, Mike Morris is 295lbs. Again, no pattern within the group, but maybe now the pattern across three teams is variety.

The other thing that I want this mock to be is: an anticipation of the NFL Combine. I’m avoiding guys that I think will test average to below average at the Combine, and trying to get ahead on guys that I think will test well. Ezeiruaku, to me, ticks a lot of boxes.

#2.59 – LB, South Carolina, Demetrius Knight

This is the first of a few points in this mock draft where I’m getting out ahead of future trend. Knight showed up to Mobile for the Senior Bowl at 6’1″/246lbs with 33″+ arms. I think he’s gonna be a riser throughout this draft process. I think there are guys in this draft that are pretenders at the linebacker spot. Knight is not that. Knight is the real deal. Knight is a grown-ass man. And that’s really all I’m gonna say about him at this time.

#3.69 – RB, Kansas State, DJ Giddens

There are a few points in this draft that I consider “cut points”. In a deep RB class, I don’t think getting Giddens in the 3rd round is a “must-have”. I have a list of what I’m looking for in a running back, and Giddens hits a lot of what I’m looking for. He’s 6’1″/212lbs with 1343 rushing yards last year. So this is a luxury pick that I’m giving myself because I’ve acquired all of these third round picks.

#3.77 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

Another point where I’m getting out ahead of trend. I’ve been on Shough for most of the year, and he’s not a third round pick right now. He’s probably, at best, a fifth rounder. Shough’s rise is not going to come from the Combine. This is not Joe Milton. Shough’s rise is going to come as everyone gets deeper into the game tape, and the private meetings at the Combine, and the realize the benefit to going through three college programs, with a couple times in his career he was forced to sit and study while recovering from injuries…this is a smart player. And it’s a grown ass man.

#3.78 – OT, UConn, Chase Lundt

I’m not going to get into the specifics of how/why I’m landing on Lundt in a very strong OT class. Some people are going to hate drafting an OL from Connecticut exactly one year after drafting Christian Haynes from the same program. But deal with it.

Lundt is listed 6’8″/305lbs, and that’s kind of all we have on him until the Combine.

#3.82 – CB, California, Nohl Williams

I ignored cornerback for entirely too long this year. But when I did delve into it, I was immediately struck by Williams. His production in 2024 was top-tier, and that might seem like the reason I’m targeting him, but it’s not. He was at the Shrine Bowl, but for some reason I can’t find his official weigh-in. He was listed 6’1″/200lbs by Cal.

#3.99 – DT, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

Robinson is a long-standing member of my mock drafts. His official Senior Bowl weigh-in came out as 6’5″/296lbs. The floor here is Brent Urban, who played for Macdonald in Baltimore as an over-sized DE. Robinson has DE/DT versatility in his Nebraska tape. I don’t think you want to use him primarily as a DE, but he has that in his bag for jumbo, short-yardage packages.

#4.105 – TE, Oregon, Terrance Ferguson

I’ve said it before and I still think it holds merit…if you trade DK, the primary replacement targets MIGHT go to a tight end, not a wide receiver. Especially in this TE class. If we can find a guy that is pushing 250lbs and runs under a 4.6 forty…that’s a nice get.

I started to include Ferguson prior to the Senior Bowl, and I’m keeping him after. New, official measurements: 6’5″/245lbs with 33 3/8″ arms. I like the combination of athleticism and blocking he brings. We just need him to pass medical testing for his past knee injuries.

#4.112 – OG, Iowa, Connor Colby

Colby, like all of my OL picks in this mock, is a very intentional pick. Listed 6’6″/310lbs and just a great value in the 4th round.

#4.137 – DT, Mississippi, JJ Pegues

Pegues, like Robinson, is a long-standing member of my mocks. We’re keeping him. Official Shrine Bowl measurements were 6’2″/323lbs with 33 1/4″ arms. He’s not a true nose tackle, but he can play there. He also can play running back and fullback, which may come into relevance in the new Kubiak scheme.

#5.173 – OL, Jacksonville State, Clay Webb

I had barely started to look at Webb prior to the Senior Bowl, but I was immediately impressed. He’s got recent history as a LG for Jacksonville, but prior to that he also was a center recruited to Georgia. He’s 6’3″/310lbs with 32 5/8″ arms. I think he might be a future center, but he might stay at guard for his rookie year until he can get more familiar with the playbook, when he’ll become the center.

#6.187 – WR, Tennessee, Dont’e Thornton

If DK becomes a trade chip, we need to find a replacement for him. A lot of recent talk has Seahawk fans connecting them to TCU’s Savion Williams, who might be 6’5″/225lbs. DK at Ole miss was 6’3″/228lbs. But I don’t think Williams is actually the comp for DK. They aren’t the same skillset.

Thornton was at the Shrine Bowl where he was not measured. He was listed by Tennessee as 6’5″/214lbs.

Savion this year had 60 catches for 611 yards and 6 TD. DK’s last year at Ole Miss he caught 26 passes for 569 yards and 5 TD. Thornton this year for the Vols caught 26 passes for 661 yards and 6 TD. See what I’m saying?

And it’s important to recognize that, I think, Thornton shows on tape that his hands aren’t perfect. He has a lot of double-catching on tape. But DK wasn’t a natural catcher when he came out of school. DK has worked on that, and improved. We’ll need Dont’e to do the same.

#6.212 – DT, Florida, Cam Jackson

This is another cut point in my mock. I don’t think this is a need pick.

The Seahawks DL snap counts last year: Leonard Williams 300lbs 66%, Jarran Reed 306lbs 60%, Dre’mont Jones 281lbs 55%, Byron Murphy 306lbs 40%, Johnathan Hankins 325lbs 34%, Roy Robertson Harris 290lbs 17%, Mike Morris 295lbs 6%, Quinton Bohanna 360lbs 0.6%. They didn’t use a true nose tackle, basically, at all. Hankins is a free agent, and whatever name you give his profile, I have his snaps going to Pegues.

I don’t think the mock drafts having Seattle drafting Michigan NT Kenneth Grant maybe don’t know what Macdonald wants to do. I think they showed this last year when they drafted Murphy, and passed on his Texas teammate T’vondre Sweat. They want their starting DL to have versatility. A true nose tackle is a specialty player that, I don’t think, they will invest in early. And they may not invest a pick in one at all. They may try to find a guy in rookie free agency.

Jackson weighed in at the Senior Bowl at 6’7″/339lbs with 34″ arms. I like his value late more than over-paying for, say, Deone Walker in the 2nd. I think Jackson is in a group with Yahya Black at 6’6″/337, 35″ arms and Jamaree Caldwell at 6’2″/342lbs, 32″ arms of guys you wait on until late.

#7.236 – WR, Auburn, Keandre Lambert-Smith

A second pick at WR would be another cut point. I don’t think we need to do this, but it’s a way to get ahead of UDFA. I really like Keandre, who is Kam Chancellor’s nephew. Only 6’0″/193lbs at the Shrine weigh-in, but he’s got 33″ arms and a nice catch radius. He reminds me a little bit of Terry Mclaurin, who I loved when he came out of Ohio State.

Lambert-Smith would be a really nice WR3 if the roster allows it, but he was Auburn’s leading receiver this year after leading Penn State in receiving in 2023. He CAN do that, too.

I love his ability in contested catches, and the route running is very solid.

Seahawks’ Senior Bowl week mock

By Jared Stanger

The annual college all-star Senior Bowl game will be played six days from today, and practices for the game begin on Tuesday, so what better time to get in a last minute mock draft to sort of plant my flag for some of the guys high on my list that may soon be moving up higher on the consensus list.

In terms of the Seahawks, it’s really feeling like they need to have a big draft. I’m talking big in terms of volume of picks. I keep looking at it, and I think this might be best served as a 12-13 pick draft. I don’t think we’ve ever seen John Schneider draft more than 11 in a given draft, so they probably won’t go to 12, but they also probably won’t make the player trades I’d like to see them make to acquire draft capital AND to accelerate their dead money problem now so that they can have a cleaner slate for 2026. Unfortunately, Schneider never takes the full measure. It’s always half-measures, that keep us perpetually in the upper-middle class of the NFL.

Seattle has one of the league’s worst cap situations heading into the new league year. Moves will need to be made. It’s just gonna be a question of which players take the brunt of the cut(s). The biggest cap hits that will make for potential trade/cut include: Geno Smith, DK Metcalf, Tyler Lockett, Dre’mont Jones, Uchenna Nwosu.

The recent league-wide coaching search has potentially opened up some interesting possibilities for the Seahawks. Former head coach Pete Carroll’s hiring in Las Vegas, and former offensive coordinator, Brian Schottenheimer’s hiring in Dallas could create a better trade market for Seahawk players that overlapped with their respective time in Seattle. The Raiders, in particular, could be a team to watch due to their #2 most cap space in the league. They have some big holes at QB and WR to fill, and they can afford to pay whoever they choose to fill them.

If just looking at teams with need at WR; I think both the Patriots and Chargers are top 5 in cap space and could use someone like DK. I tend to think there won’t be much of a trade market for Geno. He saw free agency a couple years ago, didn’t get much interest, and returned to Seattle on a pretty team-favorable deal. The Pats have 9 draft picks to trade with, the Raiders have 10 picks, and the Chargers have 11. All three teams tick a number of boxes that would point towards a good trade match.

I’m currently most interested in a Patriots deal. I like it for the possibility of swapping DK for a mid-round pick AND getting New England QB Joe Milton as part of the return. The Pats hold two picks at the top half of the third round at #3.69 and #3.77. If we were just to trade DK with no Milton add-on; I would want a 2nd-round plus draftpick. Let’s do the deal for 3.69 and Milton.

The next factor to consider is how the first round of this draft class is stacking up. How many true 1st round players are in there? How many players with similar grade will plausibly be available from, say #18 to #50 overall? I like trading back. And it’s gonna be many trades to get from 8 picks up to 12. I’m not giving analysis on who and why the trade partners are…this is just trying to line up positioning for better points in the draft.

The first move I’ve got #1.18 traded to Detroit for #1.28 + #2.60.

Immediately I flip #60 to Jacksonville for #3.70 + #4.105.

We keep moving it down with #70 to Carolina for #3.74 + #4.112.

And finally #74 goes to Pittsburgh for #3.83 + #4.121.

So the final board becomes:

#1.28, #2.50, #3.69, #3.82, #3.83, #4.105, #4.112, #4.121, #4.136, #5.172, #6.186, #6.211, #7.235

Before we get to the actual picks. I already know some of these are gonna get blown up by rising tides. This is just for now.

#1.28 – OL, Ohio State, Donovan Jackson

There are a number of spots throughout this mock where I’ve got symbolic duos. At this one, we’ve got two guys that should be day one starters at left guard. If we get either Jackson or Tyler Booker, I think we’re off to a fantastic start to the draft. Honestly, this pick could open up if we included some of the tackles that might slide inside to guard like Wyatt Milum. It’s, overall, a very strong OL draft, and that’s one of the reasons I like the trade back to start adding volume.

Jackson gets might slight nod over Booker due to the way he adjusted to playing left tackle for the Buckeyes after the season-ending injury to Josh Simmons. And, really, with Schneider’s recent comments about guards over-paid and over-drafted; maybe a guy that most-recently played well at tackle, can be the exception (see: Germain Ifedi).

This pick needs to be a leader. I feel confident that Jackson, Booker, Milum, Armand Membou, Josh Conerly all have very strong leadership traits. The Seahawk OL, as currently contructed, doesn’t have a leader. Certainly not one that is playing well enough to remain in the starting lineup, and lead from the field.

#2.50 – DS, South Carolina, Nick Emmanwori

I don’t have a great, articulate justification for this pick. Do the Seahawks have room for a high-priced safety pick?? Do they need a starting safety? It doesn’t really feel like it. But that also makes this feel like good drafting. This will be the best player available if he falls this far. He won’t.

I like everything that Emmanwori brings to the table. He’s a 6’3″/227lb safety that should light up the Combine. He’s as big as many modern linebackers. He posted 6.77 tackles per game, which is a lot for a safety. And he had 4 INT and 2 PBU, to demonstrate his coverage ability. This could, potentially, be Mike Macdonald’s new Kyle Hamilton type that he can just create around.

#3.69 – DE, South Carolina, Kyle Kennard

Defensive end is one of the strongest positions in this draft, so it will be a bit of a game of draft chicken to push drafting one this far. It’s probably the smarter move to take one with the #50, but I think Emmanwori is the rarer player.

There’s an underlying theme to this entire draft class. Kennard matches up very well with this theme. He’s 6’5″/255lbs and had an impressive 15.5 TFL, 11.5 sacks, and 10 hurries. One of his most-notable performances was the game he played vs likely 1st round pick OT Will Campbell.

#3.82 – DT, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

The Seahawks have some issues to resolve along the DL. As we mentioned earlier, there are some potential cap casualties that could be lost. But there are also the free agents: Jarran Reed and Johnathan Hankins. We need some fresh bodies. And they can kinda be all different body types. Dre’mont is 6’3″/281lbs and plays mostly outside. Jarran is 6’3″/306lbs and plays some undersized nose tackle. Hankins is 6’3″/325lbs but was never really the run-stuffer his size would suggest.

I kinda like targeting some DL that have versatility. Robinson has it in droves. He’s 6’6″/310lbs and he’s played all over the DL for the Huskers, not to mention some fullback. Last year, he had 12.5 TFL, 7.0 sacks, 7 hurries, 4 PBU, 1 FF, and a blocked kick. I think he can absorb snaps from both Dre’mont and Jarran.

#3.83 – TE, Oregon, Terrance Ferguson

Tight end is a few things in this draft: it’s a good position group, it’s a player that could figuratively give you some replacement production for the traded DK Metcalf, and it’s another of my player duos. Michael Arroyo is the counterpart to Ferguson, and he might be the better candidate to replace DK, but he also might post the better forty time at the combine and be drafted earlier.

Ferguson is 6’5″/255lbs and his season included 43 receptions for 591 yards and 3 TD. The key to Ferguson is his ability after the catch.

#4.105 – CB, California, Nohl Williams

For whatever reason this year, I haven’t been looking closely at the corner class. When I started correcting that omission recently; I almost instantly fell for Nohl Williams. He’s a 6’1″/200lb corner who posted 7 INT and 9 PBU. When I crack open the tape; I thought his press technique was immaculate. His footwork is very good, and I think the long-speed might be REALLY good.

#4.112 – OT, UConn, Chase Lundt

Here, we find our third of the duos. In what is overall a very cool class for right tackles; I’d like to see Seattle draft one of Lundt or Ozzy Trapilo. In a practical sense, this guy can replace the free agent Stone Forsythe, but really we’re trying to find an eventual replacement for Abraham Lucas. Just in case.

Lundt is the better rush blocker, and Trapilo is the better pass blocker. I’m going with the run-blocker until we have a larger sample size on what Macdonald likes.

#4.121 – DT, Ole Miss, JJ Pegues

Going back to the DL, I think we need a big time run-stuffer, and there are a number of big body guys we could look at. The thing is…I’m not sold that Macdonald wants to use a true nose tackle…like somebody that weighs over 330lbs. I think he wants to disguise defensive play call by using players with versatility. Everybody on the team needs to be able to play both run and pass so that teams can’t audible out of play calls, or if they do they’re audibling to something we can also still defend.

With Pegues, we get a bit more heft from his 6’2″/323lb build. I believe those measurements went official yesterday at the Shrine game weigh-in. Oh, and 33″+ arms. So more heft from Pegues, and more versatility. Pegues can also give you DE snaps (see below). And he’s lowkey electric as a running back in goalline or short-yardage situations.

This year, JJ had 13.5 TFL, 3.5 sacks, 5 hurries, and 7 rushing TD. And just a great dude.

#4.136 – QB, Louisville, Tyler Shough

It’s been one of my greatest frustrations the last few years that John Schneider passes on drafting a QB anytime in the 3rd-6th rounds. They could have had Sam Howell at 5th round cost, instead of what became a 3rd round price in trade. They could have drafted Joe Milton directly instead of DJ James, who never even made it out of training camp.

Shough is a 6’5″/225lb, 6th-year senior, who will likely be available later in the draft than his tape suggests because of his age. I think the age thing on draft QB’s is incorrectly considered. I think some maturity in a QB is actually helpful.

In terms of production, Shough had 3195 yards, 23 TD, 6 INT, 62.7% completion, and a 148.15 passer rating.

Give me a QB competition between Joe Milton and Tyler Shough and I’ll love the upside of the 2025 Seahawk offense.

#5.172 – OL, Jacksonville State, Clay Webb

I’ve been saying for weeks that this is a very good OL class…but not at center. I like Florida’s Jake Slaughter quite a bit as an OL intellectual. As part of my due diligence, I was ticking off some of the Senior Bowl players that I was not familiar with.

Coming from Jacksonville State, I definitely had not looked at Webb. One of the first things I found was that he actually was originally committed to Georgia as a center. At Jacksonville State, Webb was playing left guard, and interestingly he does it with no gloves. This guy is old school. Oh, and his measurements are 6’3″/310lbs.

#6.186 – LB, South Carolina, Demetrius Knight

Linebacker is an interesting conversation in this draft. There aren’t many strong candidates. You either draft one before the end of the 3rd round, or you push hard into the late rounds and hope Ernest Young re-signs.

For the longest time, I was trying to force the former method. Only in the last few days did I come to terms with doing the latter. And I’m kinda digging it. I had been stashing Knight in my back pocket as a guy I wanted to make the back half of a LB double-dip.

I actually love Knight in the 6th more than I did Carson Schwesinger in the 3rd. At 6’2″/245lbs, Knight is already a throwback to an era of linebacker from 10-15 years ago when they were this big. I watch Knight’s tape and I think his size plays. The dude has more stopping power than most of this group. And his speed/athleticism is really underrated.

#6.211 – WR, Kansas, Quentin Skinner

It’s a very good testament to the depth of WR this year (and most years) that I have, like, 5-6 names I want to draft here. And I’m still considering taking two WR in consecutive picks.

I’m going with Skinner for checking the most boxes. He’s 6’5″/195lbs and has really good body control. He only had 25 catches this year, but they went for 557 yards (a very high 22.28 ypc). He had only 4 TD, but if you look at his efficiency stats…16% of his catches went for TD, and a ridiculous 52% of them were explosive catches. I think there’s more to be found in there.

On tape, I found myself noting time and time again how wide open he was. You rarely see that anymore. But he also can win contested. He’s a very well-rounded WR, and he can play special teams gunner.

#7.235 – RB, Michigan, Kalel Mullings

I think it’s important draft strategy to take guys from the position groups that are strong in a given year. Everyone knows this is a good RB class. But, for me, that also meant I ended up pushing RB further and further down my board.

Mullings is listed 6’2″/233lbs and rushed for 948 yards, 5.12 YPC, and 12 TD this year.

Some names that I just couldn’t find room for, but liked:

At WR, I really like Kam Chancellor’s nephew, Keandre Lambert Smith. Not a huge body, but he’s great winning in the air contested. He had a ton of explosive plays, and some very intriguing analytics.

Dont’e Thornton is another WR that I’ve got pinned. He’s a huge body guy and he should blow up the combine. He might be the most 1-for-1 replacement for DK…but that includes the fact that his hands are a little sketchy. DK had that, too, and god bless him, he’s improved that as a pro.

The third WR I’ve got in mind is Pat Bryant from Illinois. Again, he’s got REALLY interesting analytics. And I like Ja’corey Brooks and Andrew Armstrong…two very productive guys this year…at the right price.

Mullings was kind of a throw in as my RB pick. I like some other guys more, but just didn’t feel like we needed to push that pick. I love Kaleb Johnson and Omarion Hampton, but can Seattle really be spending another 2nd round pick on a RB? I think DJ Giddens is potentially the best value RB when we look back at this draft in 5 years. I just wish he was a bit thicker. And Damien Martinez had some great analytics from his 2024 season that popped in my research.

I like QB Jaxson Dart better than most of this class, and if we’re not getting Joe Milton back; maybe I make a move on Dart (and still draft Shough late). The buzz on Dart is really starting to pick up, so we’re probably using a 1st rounder to get him, and we might need to use the #18.

Some OL guys that popped in my analytic look at OL included Florida’s OT Brandon Crenshaw and Georgia OC Jared Wilson. These feel like Seahawk picks, too.

I haven’t given him a full tape-study, but TE Jalin Conyers popped in my analytic study. So he may be the third TE behind Arroyo and Ferguson for mid-rounds.

At DE, I had LSU edge Bradyn Swinson in my rough draft for this mock. Good production, some very good intangibles, and he had some numbers pop in the analytics study for DE projectability.

Up next…Senior Bowl weigh-in, practice, and game. Then Combine. Then we try to steal info on Seahawk 30 visit names. Then we draft in April.

My take on 2024 movies

By Jared Stanger

I’ve been trying to post some kind of “best movies of 2024/Oscar prediction” story for a few weeks now, but I keep putting it off in order to get more touted films checked off my list. I’ve just come out of a screening of “The Brutalist” earlier today, so now might be as close to ready as I’m gonna get without waiting until February. Plus, the Oscar nominations were supposed to be out today, but have been postponed a week due to the L.A. fires.

As of today, I’ve seen about 40 of the top 50 movies by critical acclaim and/or by significant box office performance (and a few that I’ve just watched as a fan of movies) of the 2024 season. I’ve also done some digging into the Oscar Best Picture winners of the last 10 years to create a scoring system to determine what, analytically, looks like a potential winner by recent historical comparison.

The thing about the last 10 years, or more accurately nine weird years capped off by one year in 2023 of a more normalized choice of Oppenheimer, is that the Academy has been out of its mind. Here is the list:

Birdman
Spotlight
Moonlight
Shape of Water
Green Book
Parasite
Nomadland
CODA
Everything Everywhere All At Once
Oppenheimer

When is the last time you’ve watched ANY of those movies? How many of them have you only ever seen once, if that?? The Oscars used to recognize movies that were rewatchable classics. And maybe that was more like 15 years ago. I don’t know what changed. I don’t know why it changed. Are they trying to be modern and trendy? Are they trying to be socially conscious or political? I honestly don’t know. It certainly doesn’t look like they’re trying to be populist, as most of those winners weren’t exactly box office performers.

In that same time-frame, some of the other best picture nominees that lost Best Picture includes: Whiplash, Fury Road, The Martian, The Revenant, Arrival, Hell or High Water, Dunkirk, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Joker, Jojo Rabbit, Ford vs Ferrari, 1917, Sound of Metal, Dune.

Like, what are we doing here??

I’m starting to be more and more cynical that 2024 will join the ranks of the Green Book, CODA, Moonlight ranks as just a nonsense winner.

The Brutalist

As I said, I’ve just finished seeing “The Brutalist”. It. Was. Fucking. Awful. Let me be more specific…the script is fucking awful. It is a terrifically beautiful movie to look at it, and I very much liked the score. But this dialogue is barely a step above something you’d find in porn. Like, in real conversation, a person doesn’t call their cousin “cousin”. Because the two both already know who each other are. Shit like that is how bad writers try to sneak in lazy exposition.

I can now say that the two Golden Globe winners for Best Picture Drama and Musical (Brutalist joining Emelia Perez) are two of the worst winners I’ve ever seen. Is this an AI related thing? Are we seeing more and more scripts that are secretly written by ChatGPT and nobody bothered to have a real human writer punch them up??

Brady Corbet, the writer and director of “The Brutalist”, should maybe cutback on his multi-hyphenate titles. Stick to directing, I say. Corbet, when accepting one of his Golden Globe wins, talked about a filmmaker should have final say on the edit of his movie. If the 3 hour and 35 minute theatrical cut was Corbet getting his way, bro you are fucking wrong. You need editing.

At one point in the movie, Corbet shows us two shots of a maid walking across a lawn to a guest house while carrying bed linens. HOW IS THIS NOT EXPENDABLE?? There were also multiple times in the first half of the movie that Corbet uses, presumably, real news footage/b-roll on the history of Philadelphia. All of that can go. It does not matter if this movie is set in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Detroit, or Gary, Indiana. Certainly we don’t need more than a passing mention that it is in Philly.

In addition to the editing (down) needed in the cut of the film, the bigger problem is probably that nobody edited down the script. There are so many lazy and exploitative plot devices. Does Adrien Brody’s lead character, Laszlo Toth, really need to be Jewish in addition to being a recent immigrant? What storylines would open up if we made Laszlo a heroin junkie?? Then there’s the lazy structure that the antagonist is the rich prick, but Corbet also swings wildly between the rich prick being a prick, but then giving Toth incredible praise and opportunity, and then make another INSANE swing to where the rich prick becomes a gay, anal rapist out of fucking nowhere. Does Laszlo’s wife, played by Felicity Jones, really need to be in a wheelchair from osteoporosis, only to late in the movie be able to walk for a climactic scene??

Speaking of the wife…there’s like a niece character played by Daniel Radcliffe in a wig that comes to the U.S. with her as a sort of nurse/companion. One night, in an extremely painful bout of osteoporosis, the nurse gets called to the wife’s bedside to…give her a pill. What? Her husband laying by her side couldn’t do that?? I guess not because his preferred treatment method is to just shoot his wife up with heroin. Cool.

Quickfire things in “The Brutalist” script that we’re just supposed to be okay with:

Laszlo befriends a black man and his son in a line for a soup kitchen, and then the son disappears for like an hour of the movie with no explanation while his dad and Laszlo shoot heroin.

Wife not strong enough to walk (until a specific plot point), but she can still become a writer for an English-language New York magazine when her first language is not English, and can also give a vigorous handjob to her husband on their first night after being reunited. Although, it kind of seemed like Laszlo couldn’t get it up from the handy. I guess the wife wasn’t the only one with brittle bones.

Corbet really gives me creepy vibes before the movie, but definitely during the movie, because it is VERY kinky. Girl masturbates guy, guy masturbates girl, guy visits old-timey stroke flick theater, guy visits brothel, happy couple have pretty inappropriate heroin-fueled full-frontal sex scene (clearly using two body doubles for Brody and Jones), and the aforementioned anal rape. Oh, and there’s kind of a weird, incestuous cousin cuck scene, which then becomes the inexplicable reason for a 180 degree turn, relationship fallout between the cousins. As one does.

There’s also this unneccessary subplot where the rich prick’s son insults Laszlo’s niece (the nurse) for being, I dunno…mute? Jewish? Poor? But even though she’s “gross” in some way, he still has that thing in movies where the rich, handsome, athletic, or popular guy character wants to get a blowjob from some poor, plain, unpopular girl to show his superiority. The movie shows us him starting to make a move on her, but then don’t show us anything actually happen, and instead cut to later when she walks back to Felicity Jones, but she’s adjusting her clothes…the universal shorthand for “I was just naked seconds ago having sex”. I guess the actual date rape scene will be in the director’s cut on the blu-ray.

After winning the Golden Globe for Best Actor, I guess Adrien Brody is one of the favorites to win the Oscar in the same category. I really am having trouble signing off on that. Brody is fine in the part, I guess, but I just can’t suspend my disbelief long enough to get past the terrible dialogue.

A Real Pain

That same sentiment can be applied to overwhelming favorite for Best Supporting Actor, Kieran Culkin, for his performance in “A Real Pain”. I went into both “The Brutalist” and “A Real Pain” with the highest of hopes. The trailers, the critical buzz, the media campaigns all pointed to both of these movies being directly in my wheelhouse. But both disappointed me in very similar ways.

“A Real Pain” also has some lazy, Jewish/Holocaust exploitative elements. It also has another pretty weird cousin relationship at the center of the story. It also has, to my mind, some crazy continuity problems in terms of story and selectively applying character traits. And the plot, in general, is pretty insane.

Two cousins, close friends in childhood, have grown apart after one attempted suicide and the other got married and had a kid, but then they decide to reconcile their relationship after their grandmother died, and the ideal place to do all of this is on the jovialist of places…on a multi-day, guided, group tour of the holocaust.

Is that even a real thing? Like, I’m aware that people go to Auschwitz and Dachau, but I kinda pictured those types of pilgrimmages being smaller, more intimate, more personal. The idea of two cousins joining up with four strangers and a tour guide like they all bought the same groupon; just seemed bizarre to me.

There’s a very strong chance that Jesse Eisenberg also wins a Screenplay Oscar for this movie, and that’s so baffling to me. Of the two main characters, one is manic, one is depressive, and they’re both intolerable personalities. Are we really supposed to think it’s okay for Culkin’s character to have these really offensive outbursts at the expense of the members of the tour because 30 minutes before or after he was leading the group in an imaginary storming of the German front? Oh, he’s so fun and silly and talks fast and sarcastic so he must be a free spirit and not just a selfish, indulgent prick.

How is no one else seeing this??? I swear to God, just go watch “Igby Goes Down” instead.

Wicked & Emilia Perez

Here we have two entries from a similar vein…the movie musical. I, overwhelmingly, HATE this type of movie. I very rarely can tolerate characters breaking into song (and especially choreography) with the music coming from an imaginary orchestra. I don’t like songs that are giving exposition and/or pushing the plot forward. If you can bake the song, or the songwriting into the plot…then maybe I can stay involved.

In the instances of “Wicked” and “Emilia Perez” we have two very different cases. I’ve tried to watch “Emilia Perez” and my firsthand take is that it is truly bad. I tried to watch it…twice. And that movie analytic I referenced earlier…”Emelia Perez” is one of the three worst scores of the 50+ movies studied. Like, it was worse than the Clooney/Pitt vehicle “Wolfs”. It was worse than “Imaginary Friends”. That is an objective statistic. None of the Best Picture winners from the previous 10 years has scored even close to as bad as that movie. And yet…it is winning awards and continues to stack nominations.

On the other hand, “Wicked” I have not seen, but on the movie analytic it is a top 10 scoring movie. And I believe it has had very good box office numbers. I’m sure I will not like it, but I will give it the old college try (once it goes free to stream) before the Oscar broadcast. Historically, analytically speaking…I think “Wicked” is a potential winner.

A few more of the movies that have some awards buzz that I have not seen:

Sing Sing

The #2 scoring movie. I’m actually looking forward to seeing it, but it’s been hard to find it screening in WA until, I think, today. I will see it probably in the next two weeks.

September 5

I’m pretty indifferent to this one. I won’t really prioritize seeing it unless it actually gets nominated.

Nickel Boys

Like “Sing Sing”, I’d like to see this one. The first person POV look that director Ramell Ross incorporated in this movie is at least interesting. It’s been done before, but I’m not sure I’ve seen those movies.

Nosferatu

I don’t get the sense this is a strong candidate for the major Oscar awards, but I did really like director Robert Eggers movie “The Witch”, and the cast and trailer of this look pretty great.

A bit of rapid fire on the potential Best Animated nominees:

Wild Robot

The highest scoring movie in my database for the year. I kind of hated it. The script feels like it was, ironically, written by a robot/AI. A lot of what I found enjoyable about my favorite movies, and disagreeable about films I disliked, this year, was the pacing. In “Wild Robot” the pacing felt breathless. You’re never left to dwell in a moment for any time at all. The attempts at humorous moments felt slapstick without being funny, and the attempts at sentimentality felt forced and uncompelling.

You’re better off re-watching “Iron Giant”, “Bambi”, or watch “Flow” from this year.

Flow

A beautifully animated, almost silent film surrounding a group of animals actions before/during/after a cataclysmic flood. I’m not sure I understood the totality of it, but there’s nothing to say that is requirement for appreciation. In fact, that can mean it needs another watch.

Robot Dreams

Three animated movies in and we’ve got three with animal central characters, and two with animals interacting with robots. “Robot Dreams” is another that tends more towards a silent film aesthetic. I liked the animation style, but I couldn’t finish it. It needed to get where it was going faster.

Inside Out 2

I wasn’t really a fan of the first one, and I couldn’t finish this one. I just don’t love the gimmick central to this story.

Memoir of a Snail

What a beautiful movie to look at, but holy shit this is depressing. Maybe it pivots at the end to something uplifting, but it sat too long in sad that I moved on. Did not finish.

Live action misses that are still getting award show buzz:

The Substance & A Different Man

I put these two movies together because they both feel like blown out versions of an old “Twilight Zone” episode called “Eye of the Beholder”. Both movies deal with actors trying to deal with standards of beauty. We’ve got one from a female perspective and one from the male. Both movies probably have stronger chances to win their lead actors the prize for their respective categories than they do for winning Best Picture. But they might get nominations for the night’s biggest category.

I did not love either of these movies. “The Substance” seemed to have the better overall concept, but the backend of this movie downgrades to the quality of film you’d normally find coming out of Troma Entertainment, like “Toxic Avenger” or “Basket Case”. Actually, I don’t remember if “Basket Case” was Troma, but it came to mind.

I just can’t believe that I have to have a conversation about this movie as a potential Best Picture. This movie should be found in future history books as a cult classic only.

Juror #2

One of the biggest hoaxes in all of Hollywood, for me, is the classification of Clint Eastwood as a great director. Nothing he has made has ever approached true greatness. He’s the king of obvious, paint by number movie making. I think the true criticism should be that Eastwood lives entirely in the middle. He’s a C- to C+ film maker. There is nothing terrible in his catalogue, but there is also nothing great.

And the funny thing is…I don’t think anyone else really likes him either. But there’s this sort of standing groupthink that has created this echo chamber where, movie after movie, we just talk about him and his movies like he’s in the echelon of Spielberg and Scorsese.

When was the last time you re-watched a Clint Eastwood movie??? Hell, when is the last time a Clint Eastwood movie has come up in your casual conversation?

Since 2006, this is Eastwood’s filmography: Flags of Our Fathers/Letters from Iwo Jima, Changeling, Gran Torino, Invictus, Hereafter, J Edgar, Jersey Boys, American Sniper, Sully, The 15:17 to Paris, The Mule, Richard Jewell, Cry Macho, and now Juror #2. What in there do you love??

“Juror #2” is just silly. We’re shown from the beginning what really happened, so, I guess, the suspense is supposed to be will Nicolas Hoult’s lead character do the right thing? Maybe the momentary tease that maybe he will be caught by JK Simmons or Toni Collette.

If you want a courtroom thriller; you’re better off watching “A Few Good Men”, or “The Rainmaker”, or even the recent Jake Gyllenhaal re-make of “Presumed Innocent”.

Dune 2

At this point, before I get into the movies of 2024 that I truly did enjoy, we’re at the biggest “cusp” movie. I don’t have much complaint with this movie…great box office, great analytic score, great director Denis Villeneuve, great cast…but I felt the same way about it that I felt about “Avatar 2”: it’s a fine picture continuing what was already established. But there’s nothing special differentiating it from the first film. AND…we’re already conscious that there will be another one coming. It’s literally mid, in a sense.

And now for the movies of 2024 that I really did love. As I talked about in my opener; I’m presupposed to the movies that have that quality that begets seeing them repeatedly. I’ve seen almost every one of these movies at least twice already. These are the movies I couldn’t wait to tell other people about as I was walking out of the theatre. These are my top 10 of 2024:

#10 – Chasing Chasing Amy

2024 was kind of a big year for the trans community in film and TV. I believe, if I had finished “Emilia Perez”, it gets into trans themes. I think “Baby Reindeer” had a trans character or storyline if I finished that. “Ripley” had a trans actor. But the two that I thought were the most interesting were both documentaries. There was the Netflix doc featuring Will Ferrell and his friend Harper Steele that got a pretty big publicity run earlier this year, and then only recently I stumbled upon “Chasing Chasing Amy”.

I am a longtime, sometimes recovering, fan of Kevin Smith and his movies. His career has gone through a number of ebbs and flows, but I will generally get around to seeing most of the stuff he’s made. For me, the probable apex of his works is the 1997 romantic comedy, “Chasing Amy”. It’s the story of two comic book writers that meet and struggle to navigate through sexuality, gender politics, and the expectations of such placed on them by friends and society, to see if they can find love. The catch is…what if the girl likes other girls?

Sitting in a movie theatre watching that movie for the first time was the literal moment I realized I wanted to, and potentially could, write a movie. Personally, as a straight white male, I wasn’t seeing it and relating to it as a straight guy falling in love with a lesbian. I saw it and related to a guy falling in love with someone who wasn’t open to falling in love with him back.

For Sav Rodgers, the director of “Chasing Chasing Amy”, Smith’s film was relatable, and inspiring for their own reasons. This documentary carries a nice balance of giving us the backstory of the Smith movie’s creation, production, release, and various stages of it’s shelf-life, including discussion of when/how it came to be viewed as “problematic”, and the counterpoint of why it isn’t problematic if you, ironically, hadn’t marketed it as a “boy falls in love with a lesbian” movie.

The documentary brings us interviews with Smith himself, many of the View Askew production team, and two of “Chasing Amy’s” three primary cast members, Joey Lauren Adams and Jason Lee. But the surprise of the documentary is how Sav Rodgers becomes the central character in their own documentary. It’s surprising, and thoughtful, and emotional, and just a beautiful little film. It hit me surprisingly hard.

#9 – The Outrun

This film is a depiction of the true life story of Scottish writer Amy Liptrot, from her self-penned memoir. Saoirse Ronan plays a version of Liptrot as a character named Rona, who is an alcoholic, as she wanders through recovery and relapse. The filmmakers take us in and out of present day and flashback. All amongst the backdrop of a tiny, cold, windswept island in the Scottish archipelago.

The headline here is Ronan. She is consistently one of movie-making’s best actresses. She is in almost every frame of this movie. And her performance is absolutely breathtaking. The way she, a native Irish, can master a Scottish dialect. The way she can go big at the mania moments of an alcoholic on an active bender, but then find the most incredible quiet, complicated stillness in some of the toughest moments of recovery…it is just mesmerizing.

There is a moment of this film…and it really is only a moment, a look, a breath…that was so impossibly real and heartbreaking that I stopped the movie, rewound, and watched it again to make sure I saw what I thought I saw. Even now, just remembering that scene to write about it, my eyes are welling up.

It’s a crime that Saoirse has never won an Oscar, and an even bigger crime that she seems to be headed toward not even getting nominated for “The Outrun”. She is magnificent.

#8 – Strange Darling

What a wonderful little surprise. This was a movie that I heard mentioned on someone else’s year-end top movies list. I hadn’t heard much about it, but I’ve been actively seeking out great movies the last 3-4 months, since many of the overly-hyped studio releases have been so disappointing.

There is nothing about this movie that was familiar to me going in. I didn’t know the director by any of his prior work. I didn’t know either of the two leads by any of their prior roles. I didn’t know what the plot was. I think that’s actually a good way to go into seeing it. This is primarily an action, suspense, thriller. And it’s new. That’s all I want to give you.

#7 – The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare

This is a big, popcorn, action-adventure, summer blockbuster kind of movie from director Guy Ritchie, and starring Henry Cavill, Alan Ritchson, Alex Pettyfer, Eiza Gonzalez, Henry Golding and Cary Elwes, and it’s in the vein of “Inglorious Basterds” and “Indiana Jones”. The only problem is: it wasn’t a blockbuster.

The action is great. The cast is gorgeous. Eiza Gonzalez playing British surrounded by an all British cast and director is surprisingly great. The humor is tremendous. And there’s a nice little Easter egg in there tying it to another movie franchise.

#6 – Monkey Man

Here we have some familiar movie tropes brought to us by a new star in that genre, and from a new director. And both are the same guy…Dev Patel.

This is the kind of revenge, action, thriller we’ve seen from Keanu Reeves, and Denzel Washington, and Liam Neeson, and Jason Statham, and Matt Damon. Maybe a little bit of Ryan Gosling in “Drive”, as well. So it takes some pretty high skill to do that which is now standard, but to make it feel fresh and new.

I love what Patel has done here, creating new imagery, new action, and re-inventing himself as a multi-hyphenate to be reckoned with.

#5 – A Complete Unknown

Going into this movie; I had no particular fondness for Bob Dylan. If pressed, I probably like more cover versions of his songs than I do his originals. And Timothee Chalamet, to this point, has struck me more as the kind of pretty, dumb actor like Keanu Reeves that needs to be hidden behind the bells and whistles of other aspects of a movie.

I did not know Timmy had this performance in him. He’s really playing that guitar. He’s really singing those songs live to camera. The hair and costume people also kill it…they somehow make the skinny Chalamet look like he’s gotten shorter, and heavier in those boxey-ass jeans.

And director James Mangold is fully in his wheelhouse. After leading Joaquin Phoenix through his performance in “Walk the Line” and Christian Bale and Matt Damon through their portrayals of real life people in “Ford vs Ferrari”; Mangold knows how to structure a biopic. I love that, here, he’s not pushing for Dylan to be heroic. In one of my favorite moments of the film, Monica Barbaro (as Joan Baez) says to Chalamet, “you’re kind of an asshole, Bob,” to which Bob replies, “yeah, I guess.” THIS is what most of our cultural heroes truly are. Unapologetic, unrepentant assholes with a singular vision for greatness at all costs.

Chalamet deserves the Oscar. If he is our new Dicaprio; THIS is his “Gilbert Grape” moment.

#4 – Civil War

Most of the movies on this list I saw recently, and were therefore easier to remember and place. “Civil War”, from director/writer Alex Garland, was a movie I first saw maybe last May or June. But it was enough time passing that I wasn’t certain it was what I thought I remembered it was. As I made this list, and by process of elimination it started looking like it might make my top 10, I had to go back and rewatch the movie. Not only was it certainly top 10, it was actually one of the most complete movies of the year.

This movie is haunting. The same way that Garland’s “Ex Machina” was haunting for AI, or “28 Days Later” was haunting for, I don’t know, medical experiments…”Civil War” is haunting for modern American social politics. This is the kind of movie that gets banned at some point.

#3 – Rebel Ridge

One of the reasons I generally feel like most year-end “best-of” lists are bullshit; is because you NEVER see movies like “Rebel Ridge” on them. Certainly not this high.

This movie has zero pedigree. I had seen one of director Jeremy Saulnier’s prior movies, but I didn’t even know it was his movie at the time. The cast is, I guess, headlined by Don Johnson, with a cameo from James Cromwell. The third most recognizable actor in it, to me, was the guy who played Roy on “The Office”. The female lead is the grown up version of the girl who was in that “Winn Dixie” movie years ago, but whose name I never remember without googling. The lead-lead is a guy I’ve never seen before.

And the story is not new. It’s kind of almost exactly the opening of “Rambo: First Blood”. But you just have to trust me that the execution here is impeccable. This movie is like getting in on the ground floor of Rambo, of Die Hard, of Jason Bourne. There is absolutely zero fat. This is all killer, no filler.

I’m not even going to say anything else about it. Just put it on and the movie will compel you through it. When I watched this movie for the third time, I put it on for my mom…this is not, on paper, her kind of movie…but I just started it for her…after about 30 minutes she says to me, “what is this movie called?” “Rebel Ridge” “This is a GOOD movie.”

And, by the way, the lead is Aaron Pierre (somebody make this guy a star), and the female lead is AnnaSophia Robb. Cast her more, too.

#2 – Anora

There were quite a few movies this year that I went to see with raised expectations. “Anora” might be the only one that really met them. This is a thoroughly modern take on the “stripper with a heart of gold” who meets some version of prince charming. Only, does Anora have a heart of gold? And, is prince charming actually that charming? So it’s, really, a deconstruction of the “Pretty Woman” vibe.

As I said earlier, one of the big themes of the year was movie pacing. “Anora” is moving at breakneck speed throughout, but it works. The second-biggest theme, for me, might be dialogue. It has been so hard to find realistic dialogue. That might be the giveaway that we’re quietly seeing a lot of AI scripts. Especially since 2024 was the year we were seeing movies produced before and/or after the Hollywood writers’ strike of 2023.

“Anora” has some of the best dialogue of the year. And it’s spread equally across the entire cast. Everybody gets a unique voice, and they are all grounded in the real way that people talk. Wonderful. It makes watching the parts of this movie where the characters are such self-centered, indulgent little brats tolerable.

The actual best actress performance for me in 2024 was Saoirse Ronan, but since she won’t be competing; I think the next best performance might by Mikey Madison in the titular role of “Anora”. Plus, I have this long-standing theory that the Academy loves to give Oscars to actresses in roles where they show their breasts. Madison is definitely eligible from this, but so would be Demi Moore.

#1 – Conclave

I saw “Conclave” and “Anora” on consecutive days back in, I think, November, and I kept waiting for one or both to be knocked out of the top two spots, but every entrant that I’ve tried has failed. Maybe “Sing Sing” or “Nickel Boys” will do it, but for now…the title belongs to “Conclave”.

I loved this movie. It is lush and grand, while also managing to be small and intimate. It is gorgeous to look at. It is sonically incredible in both score and sound mixing. Every single cast member is acting their asses off, and they have pitch perfect dialogue to say. Ralph Fiennes was my leader in the clubhouse as Best Actor until I saw Chalamet.

In terms of the plot…I went in thinking it might be kind of a “Ten Little Indians” murder mystery thing, as we know from the trailer that there is a dead pope in the story. While the movie quickly absolves itself of a murder plot, there is still a suspenseful mystery throughout. And with the backdrop a papal conclave…something already inherently mysterious to the average person…this was one of the rare movies that managed to surprise me. Maybe not at every twist and turn, but enough to make me appreciate it for the unexpected moments. I also appreciated how the movie was, in a sense, self aware.

Was 2024 a good year for movies? I think the immediate answer is a hard ‘no’. But the more thoughtful answer has to delve into how and why we end up with the touted movies that we end up with. I legitimately don’t understand how some of the “consensus” best movies get talked about the way they do, while conversely some of the best movies, that I think people will be invested in and repeat watching for years to come, are kind of nowhere to be found. I don’t have that answer.

We just all need to love what we love. But also see me in five years. I’ll bring receipts.

Seahawks new year mock

By Jared Stanger

Welcome to 2025! As I’m writing this we’re still a few hours away from the Seahawks’ season finale in Los Angeles. It will be a meaningless game for the already-eliminated Hawks in terms of this season, but maybe it gives us some ideas about what they will be doing going forward. The big intel might be how they handle Geno Smith in the game, as he is on pace to hit a number of contract performance bonus escalators if he plays and plays well today.

I’m not a salary cap expert by any stretch, so the way I read the projections for Seattle’s 2025 cap, they’re in bad shape. Like, “bottom five teams in the league” bad. It’s no wonder they had to table negotiations to extend Ernest Jones. They really need to make some cuts first. And there aren’t really clean cuts to make. There’s a lot of dead money they are going to have to just eat. I think the best way to do that is to rip the bandaid off. The three biggest cap hits are Geno Smith, Tyler Lockett, and DK Metcalf. The single biggest cap savings would be cutting (or trading) Geno before June 1…saving $25million. The biggest dead money also comes from probably your best trade chip…DK, with $21mill dead money. And Lockett is probably the most replaceable based on his current role on the roster with JSN now looking like WR1. Lock will dead money you almost $14mill, and save you $17mill.

Personally, I might just do all three. But I kinda doubt Seattle does. I’m going to split the difference, cut Geno, trade DK, and just ride it out with the always classy Lock.

For a DK trade, I look at competitive teams that have good cap space, maybe only have a WR1, and then have a decent amount of draft capital. Buffalo has the draft picks, but don’t really have cap space. Washington has cap, but only mid on draft picks. Minnesota has cap space, but hardly any draft picks. I came away with the Chargers having the best fit.

Chargers have the 8th-most cap space. They have 11 projected draft picks. And their leading WR this year was Ladd McConkey with 1000 yards, followed by Josh Palmer and Quentin Johnston with under 600 yards. It’s a pretty young WR room, where DK would actually become the elder-statesman at 27. I’m going to project the trade is DK for the Chargers’ 2nd (#2.57) and one of their four picks in the 6th round at #6.178.

In one note on free agency, before you wonder why I don’t have Seattle drafting a left guard after losing Laken Tomlinson to free agency…I will project Seattle goes out and signs Teven Jenkins as their #1 priority in free agency.

In the first trade within the draft; I have Seattle moving back from #1.18 to #1.29 while adding #2.62 in deal with Buffalo, who also own the #2.61 pick.

We’ll immediately flip #62 to Las Vegas for pick #3.69 + #5.146. And we’ll move Seattle’s native 3rd round pick to Baltimore for their 3rd (3.91) and one of their 4th’s (4.128). This will be a LOT of draftpicks, but Seattle needs to get younger and cheaper while they take the dead cap hits from Geno and DK.

1.18(SEA)->1.29(BUF) + 2.62(BUF)

1.29(BUF) – QB, Ole Miss, Jaxson Dart

I’ve decided the way forward for Seattle isn’t to cut Geno Smith and then immediately target someone like Sam Darnold, who is going to cost almost as much as Geno. Nor do I want to lose draft picks to acquire, say, JJ McCarthy in trade. Seattle has Sam Howell under contract for another year. They also have Jaren Hall on the active roster, and then there’s John Rhys Plumlee who was also recently added to the active roster but now listed as a WR. (This might be some parlor trick bullshit until they resolve the Geno situation. It would just be a bad look to openly show four QB on the active roster in a game that doesn’t matter, but could cost the team millions.)

I think the move here is giving thorough examination of Howell, Hall, Plumlee, AND two more QB that they will get in the draft. To me, Howell, Hall, and Plumlee all have a very similar vibe, and Jaxson Dart has that same vibe. (Maybe I’m on to the right idea, but the wrong player, and it actually ends up Riley Leonard…but I prefer Dart.)

I’m not gonna telegraph the entire thinking here, but suffice to say, focus on the strategy.

2.50(SEA) – Defensive End, Boston College, Donovan Ezeiruaku

Seattle needs a more consistent Edge rush presence. Uchenna Nwosu missed most of the year injured, and now has only played 11-12 games over the last two years, producing only three sacks combined. We can’t count on him. Derick Hall has had a nice sophomore season with 8.0 sacks, but to my eye a lot of those have been coverage and/or cleanup sacks. And Boye Mafe only has one sack over his last five games, after opening the year with four sacks in the first five games.

This draft looks incredibly strong in the Edge rush class. It is the best philosophy to pick from the strength(s) of a draft. Seattle should do this just based on that, alone.

Ezeiruaku is a more long, slender, speed edge rusher than the guys we have presently have at 6’2″/247lbs. He bends the corner better than almost anyone in the class. He had 20.5 TFL, 16.5 sacks, and 15 QB hurries this year.

2.57(LAC trade DK) – Offensive Guard, Georgia, Tate Ratledge

As I said before, Seattle should target Teven Jenkins in free agency to address one of the guard spots. The second guard (right) they should get early in the draft. There are some college tackles that project to move inside that I’d be happy to get, but in this case I’m taking one of the true guards.

Ratledge is listed 6’6″/320lbs and is just one of the most well-rounded OL in the draft. Intangibles, too.

2.62(BUF)->3.69(LVR) + 5.146(LVR)

3.69(LVR) – Linebacker, Ole Miss, Chris Paul Jr

Maybe Seattle gets Ernest Jones re-signed, maybe they don’t. But Seattle needs more talent in the linebacker room. It clearly made a difference in the performance of the Seahawk defense from Baker and Dodson to Jones and Knight. If you end up redshirting Paul for a year or two…fine.

Listed 6’1″/235lbs, Paul posted 88 tackles, 11.0 TFL, 3.5 sacks, 9 hurries, 1 INT, and 4 PBU this year as the MIKE in the #14 defense in the country (#3 in scoring defense). He checks a lot of boxes that I’m looking for.

3.82(SEA)->3.91(BAL) + 4.128(BAL)

3.91(BAL) – Defensive Tackle, Nebraska, Ty Robinson

Seattle has impending free agents at DT in Jarran Reed, Johnathan Hankins, and Brandon Pili. Cameron Young has been non-existent since he was drafted in 2023. We need reinforcements on the interior DL. I’m a fan of using vets at DT, as the younger guys seem ineffective until they’ve had 3-4 years in the pro’s, but Seattle may not have the cap space to do that.

Robinson is listed 6’6″/310lbs, and he’s played everywhere along the Huskers’ line (not to mention some fullback). This year he posted 12.5 TFL, 7.0 sacks, 7 hurries, 4 PBU, 1 FF, and 1 blocked kick. It may not be a sexy pick, but this guy makes your roster better.

4.128(BAL) – Quarterback, Louisville, Tyler Shough

I mentioned last week on twitter that I kind of like Seattle doing what Washington did in 2012 when they drafted RG3 in the 1st round and then Kirk Cousins in the 4th round of that draft. I don’t really think the quality of this quarterback class will be in the 1st round. I think there’s a number of quality leaders of men that play QB, but have not caught the eye of the media, and probably not the league. But history will look kindly on a couple guys drafted in the 2nd-4th rounds.

Shough has a complicated story, having started at Oregon, played a couple injury-plagued years at Texas Tech, before finally getting a full healthy year in 2024 at Louisville. He now has ties to the schools that recently gave us Justin Herbert, Patrick Mahomes, and Lamar Jackson. He’s got the ideal QB build at 6’5″/225lbs. He’s an older player at 25, which is why he will fall in the draft, but I like his longterm prospects.

4.136(SEA comp) – Tight End, Miami, Elijah Arroyo

I think this is a lowkey nice TE class. I’d like to see the Hawks invest a decent pick at the spot. A) they need a quid pro quo replacement for free agent Pharoah Brown. B) I kinda think the right TE player could end up being a pseudo replacement for DK Metcalf.

Arroyo is listed 6’4″/245lbs and posted 35 catches for 590 yards and 7 TD this year.

5.146(LVR) – Defensive Tackle, Ole Miss, JJ Pegues

Listen, at this point, I’m just ride-or-die with some of these guys. The only thing that changes is how early I need to draft them. Pegues is one of my favorite players in the entire draft. I want him on my team. He’s listed at 6’2″/325lbs and still has a pretty legit outside edge rush. And he can get you short yardage carries as a ball carrier. He makes your roster better and deeper.

JJ finished the year with 13.5 TFL, 3.5 sacks, 5 hurries, and a total 7 rushing TD.

5.173(SEA comp) – Wide Receiver, Tennessee, Dont’e Thornton

This is another, more literal, attempt to find a replacement for Metcalf. There’s a sneaky group of BIG receivers that will be available in this draft, and most aren’t getting crazy buzz. Maybe that changes for the ones that flash at the combine, but for now I’m seeing Thornton available this late.

He’s listed 6’5″/214lbs. I believe the rep is that he will test well. And in 2024 he only had 26 catches, but he averaged 25.42 ypc on those catches, with 6 going for TD.

6.178(LAC trade DK) – Center, Florida, Jake Slaughter

One of my biggest complaints of John Schneider’s last decade running the show in Seattle has been the way he has mismanaged the center position. He traded away Max Unger and the offensive line, and the team’s success, has never been the same. And he’s screwed up time after time in the draft with his decisions (and indecisions) regarding centers.

Ironically, this year comes around and I don’t think the draft warrants an early pick at the center position. As I scan national big boards, the top ranked center isn’t coming off the board until the 5th round. Yeah, it’s potentially that empty.

So we don’t want to spend a high pick on a center, but we do need to take a shot on a potential upgrade to 2023 5th-rounder Olu Oluwatimi.

I like Slaughter. He’s listed 6’5″/308lbs. He’s a very smart player.

6.184(CHI) – Offensive Tackle, Kansas, Logan Brown

This pick is two things…1) it’s a de facto replacement for Stone Forsythe, who will be a free agent coming off IR, 2) it’s a lotto ticket to finding a decent hedge for Abe Lucas’ future at RT.

Brown is listed 6’6″/315lbs and I just like the temperment he brings.

6.210(SEA comp) – Wide Receiver, Auburn, Keandre Lambert Smith

It’s possible I’ve got way too many picks in this mock draft. There’s a reason I think it might be good to draft a high number, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s plausible. Trading draft picks isn’t as easy in reality as it is in mock draft simulators, etc. So if I were to cut down on picks, this would be the one that I’d lose first.

But I like the story of Lambert Smith. You may remember in 2015, the Seahawks had a safety named Keenan Lambert they got as an UDFA. That was Kam Chancellor’s half-brother. Well, with a first name that starts with ‘K’ and the last name Lambert, you might put together that Keandre is actually Kam’s nephew.

KLS played this year for Auburn after spending four years at Penn State. After swapping Lions for Tigers, Lambert led Auburn in receiving with 50 catches for 981 yards and 8 TD. Listed at 6’1″/182lbs, but I think he plays bigger than that. He’s very strong winning contested balls in the air. If you can get Jermaine Kearse production out of him (about 40 catches, 550 yards, an explosive play per game); that’s a great value.

7.234(SEA) – Safety, Nebraska, Deshon Singleton

There are a couple safeties in this draft that I wouldn’t mind seeing Seattle draft early, and giving Mike Macdonald his new Kyle Hamilton type. Notre Dame’s Xavier Watts is an absolute ball-hawk that is second in the country in INT this year, after tying for the national lead in the same category last year. And South Carolina’s Nick Emmanwori is a huge safety at 6’3″/227lbs that should end up one of the top performers at all positions at the Combine. Either of those guys is worthy of a top 60 pick.

Singleton is probably not as complete of a player as the two aforementioned. He basically seems to have the kind of hands that show why he’s playing defense, not offense, and his career mark of 1 total INT all but confirms it. But the guy is one of my favorite tackling safeties I’ve seen. This could be the kind of guy whose ceiling is on special teams, but it might be the special teams player that goes to the Pro Bowl every year. Listed 6’3″/210lbs with 71 tackles on the year from safety.